Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
11.4%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.42% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.038% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 87.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.9% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 26.9% | 19.6% |
| Median | 5.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.0% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 66.2% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.8% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.0% | 22.7% |
Correlation Details
| Pima Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,500,091 | 6.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 529,884 | 8.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 218,621 | 8.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 62,921 | 5.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 47,028 | 4.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 4.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 4,428 | 23.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 6.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 11.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 4.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 17.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 16.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 3.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 115 | 30.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 8.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 11.5% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 55.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 54.5% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 6.7% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 24.4% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 100.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 3,265 | 21.7% |