Lumbee Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Lumbee Single Mother Poverty
43.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,530,918 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 43.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tohono O'odham (43.0%, a difference of 0.49%), Houma (43.5%, a difference of 0.62%), Puerto Rican (44.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Cajun (40.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and Navajo (40.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 40.2% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 44.5% |
Lumbee Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.9% | 93.8% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 53.4% |
| Median | 9.9% | 54.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 41.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 20.9% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 89,795,587 | 32.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,072,251 | 36.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 208,867 | 38.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 117,575 | 42.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 79,395 | 41.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 6,668 | 32.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 8,119 | 41.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 8,625 | 42.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 4,777 | 73.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 64.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 5,727 | 60.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 58.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 10.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 34.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,753 | 68.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 50.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 71.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 62.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 95.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 45.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 6.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 26,832 | 58.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 48.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 60.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 28.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 65.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 76.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 45.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 61.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 78.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 63.2% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 54.4% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 54.7% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 25.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 58.6% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 46.1% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 49.1% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 100.0% |