Lumbee vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Chinese
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,019,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 128.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 17.1% |
| Range | 41.9% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 4.2% |
| Median | 8.6% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |