Lumbee Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Lumbee Single Female Poverty
33.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Lumbee Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.041% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 84.9% | 80.6% |
Range | 84.9% | 73.8% |
Mean | 18.1% | 39.4% |
Median | 10.2% | 39.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 30.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 48.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 18.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.5% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 15.9% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,072,818 | 23.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,077,006 | 27.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 210,864 | 31.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 117,575 | 32.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 79,395 | 34.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 6,668 | 20.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 8,119 | 32.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 24.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 4,777 | 38.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 51.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 5,727 | 43.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 48.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 17.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 29.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,753 | 56.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 18.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 74.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 49.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 39.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 80.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 40.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 6.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 26,832 | 44.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 39.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 48.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 42.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 53.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 49.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 35.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 44.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 78.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 45.6% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 42.3% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 49.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 16.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 13.3% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 41.5% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 37.5% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 35.2% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 38.1% |