Lumbee Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Lumbee Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
33.3%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,145,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254 and weighted average of 33.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.33% in poverty level among children under the age of 5.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among children under the age of 5 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 5 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 5 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Puerto Rican (34.5%, a difference of 3.7%), Navajo (31.6%, a difference of 5.4%), Crow (31.0%, a difference of 7.4%), Yuman (29.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and Tohono O'odham (29.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 29.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 33.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.5% |
Lumbee Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 16.3% |
| Maximum | 64.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.2% | 83.7% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 50.2% |
| Median | 10.5% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 34.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 60.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 26.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.9% | 21.7% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 89,444,217 | 20.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,069,822 | 24.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 198,690 | 29.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 111,284 | 26.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 74,936 | 28.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 6,668 | 35.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 6,149 | 16.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 8,143 | 28.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 3,411 | 91.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 49.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 5,727 | 27.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 64.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 44.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 34.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 17,456 | 55.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 60.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 90.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 48.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 46.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 24,403 | 49.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 45.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,132 | 59.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 42.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 60.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 85.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 33.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 59.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 55.6% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 61.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 43.2% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 66.1% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 100.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 49.1% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 38.3% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 36.6% |