Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
30.7%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 64.2% | 78.3% |
| Range | 64.2% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 38.6% |
| Median | 9.2% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 51.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 26.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 16.0% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,062,601 | 20.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,082,390 | 22.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 206,282 | 26.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 108,755 | 24.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 78,025 | 24.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 19.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 7,714 | 17.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 8,625 | 35.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 4,777 | 59.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 47.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 4,787 | 25.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 43.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 49.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 33.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 45.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 52.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 26.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 60.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 48.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 38.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 14.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 26,832 | 34.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 31.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 51.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 19.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 34.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 78.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 32.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 62.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 55.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 59.8% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 42.7% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 60.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 10.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 51.3% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 36.3% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 31.9% |