Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty
6.4%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Houma influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Houma simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Houma by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Houma Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 14.2% | 34.9% |
Range | 14.2% | 32.6% |
Mean | 3.6% | 8.0% |
Median | 3.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
Houma Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 35,227,947 | 6.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 562,004 | 5.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 300,673 | 4.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 261,210 | 4.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 85,949 | 6.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 41,757 | 8.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 4,244 | 5.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 23,419 | 5.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 11,896 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 9,240 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 8,600 | 8.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 9,287 | 4.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 7,961 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 26,788 | 2.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,118 | 7.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 5,619 | 10.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 33,094 | 3.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 15,373 | 6.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 11,624 | 6.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.40% | 2,386 | 3.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,192 | 9.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 35,760 | 5.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.46% | 5,845 | 8.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 3,762 | 23.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 2,880 | 6.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 2,511 | 3.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,347 | 34.9% |