Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pueblo
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty
11.1%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,779,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398 and weighted average of 11.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.27% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pueblo and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pueblo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Pueblo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 6.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and Yuman (9.7%, a difference of 14.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.045% | 0.23% |
| Maximum | 97.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.2% | 99.8% |
| Mean | 42.7% | 20.5% |
| Median | 32.1% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.3% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 70.4% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.7% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.4% | 23.5% |
Correlation Details
| Pueblo Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.045% | 116,476,465 | 5.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 1,408,733 | 6.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 1,213,460 | 7.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 257,881 | 5.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 26,497 | 11.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 99,109 | 9.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 5,899 | 8.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 10,805 | 26.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 117,495 | 10.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 11,534 | 11.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 5,571 | 8.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 192 | 14.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 2,902 | 9.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 20,354 | 6.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 18,479 | 18.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.00% | 422 | 20.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 1,063 | 11.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.17% | 423 | 2.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.84% | 489 | 23.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 1,552 | 6.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 547 | 10.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.97% | 11,614 | 7.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.02% | 1,583 | 11.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 15,895 | 7.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 1,472 | 0.23% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.14% | 422 | 31.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.20% | 2,165 | 1.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.03% | 2,336 | 5.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.55% | 361 | 31.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.50% | 5,450 | 1.8% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.72% | 3,817 | 6.4% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23% | 2,906 | 3.1% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.06% | 922 | 72.0% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.60% | 728 | 7.7% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.41% | 340 | 100.0% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.32% | 2,841 | 5.5% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.25% | 3,393 | 23.5% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75% | 2,021 | 3.2% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.86% | 1,422 | 44.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 722 | 7.1% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.51% | 515 | 12.7% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.28% | 1,349 | 22.8% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.48% | 230 | 100.0% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.26% | 5,520 | 10.8% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.96% | 481 | 7.5% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.72% | 1,006 | 10.8% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.27% | 1,173 | 11.9% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.30% | 886 | 47.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.97% | 1,283 | 6.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.99% | 1,430 | 39.6% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.77% | 229 | 46.2% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.93% | 1,824 | 40.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.37% | 2,070 | 9.0% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.82% | 1,877 | 14.4% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 1,743 | 21.0% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.45% | 620 | 13.7% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.33% | 75 | 66.7% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.22% | 962 | 100.0% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.79% | 9,033 | 19.7% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.20% | 6,789 | 20.6% |