Lumbee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Lumbee Family Poverty
17.0%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,238,507 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 17.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.00095% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), Crow (16.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and Hopi (15.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |
Lumbee Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 47.0% |
| Range | 84.9% | 43.3% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 20.6% |
| Median | 10.9% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 26.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.9% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.6% | 10.3% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,435,663 | 10.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,118,402 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 13.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 117,960 | 14.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 79,518 | 14.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 8.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 10.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 16.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 4,777 | 22.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 22.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 20.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 32.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 8.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 20.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 27.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 19.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 47.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 24.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 13.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 45.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 21.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 7.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 21.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 20.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 26.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 13.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 27.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 29.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 6.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 17.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 33.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 31.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 25.8% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 20.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 26.9% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 29.6% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 3.7% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 8.9% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 21.0% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 22.8% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 46.6% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 18.9% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 13.8% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 8.2% |