Lumbee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Lumbee Male Poverty
20.2%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,248,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 20.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.0011% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |
Lumbee Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 58.5% |
| Range | 84.9% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 21.0% | 24.5% |
| Median | 10.9% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.9% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.6% | 11.2% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,439,998 | 13.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 13.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 119,304 | 15.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 18.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 12.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 9.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 19.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 22.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 7,080 | 27.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 20.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 45.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 15.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 23.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 30.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 17.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 58.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 38.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 19.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 44.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 28.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 17.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 25.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 25.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 28.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 12.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 32.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 30.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 10.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 22.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 36.5% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 38.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 32.7% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 13.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 33.0% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 33.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 14.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 14.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 23.4% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 25.8% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 49.7% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 22.7% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 13.7% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 14.7% |