Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
18.1%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,990,510 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 18.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.3%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from Cuba (17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dominican (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Hopi (17.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and Navajo (17.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 21.4% |
Lumbee Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 66.7% |
| Range | 84.9% | 63.5% |
| Mean | 19.8% | 20.5% |
| Median | 11.2% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 12.4% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,190,563 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,118,530 | 11.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 217,488 | 12.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 119,144 | 13.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 78,062 | 13.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 9.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 8.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 15.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 4,432 | 17.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 13.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 5,999 | 25.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 22.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 3.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 18.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 15.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 51.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 24.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 32.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 6.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 22.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 7.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 16.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 21.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 17.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 6.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 18.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 19.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 4.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 17.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 31.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 33.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 23.5% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 24.7% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 42.9% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 26.8% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 27.9% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 3.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 16.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 19.6% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 27.3% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 66.7% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 24.4% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 33.9% |