Lumbee Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Poverty
Lumbee Poverty
21.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 21.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0025% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 5.1%), Yup'ik (20.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and Navajo (23.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.4% |
Lumbee Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 51.2% |
| Range | 84.9% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 22.3% | 26.0% |
| Median | 11.2% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.3% | 33.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.8% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.0% | 10.7% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,445,489 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 15.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 17.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 16.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 18.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 11.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 14.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 19.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 24.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 24.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 23.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 36.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 24.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 24.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 32.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 24.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 43.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 32.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 18.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 51.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 28.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 13.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 26.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 27.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 33.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 13.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 35.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 33.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 7.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 25.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 37.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 51.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 33.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 32.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 33.1% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 37.5% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 7.2% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 27.5% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 28.7% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 27.6% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 46.6% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 25.2% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.59% | 147 | 20.4% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 10.9% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 14.4% |