Lumbee vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Australians
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,019,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 93.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 73.3% |
| Range | 41.9% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 6.5% |
| Median | 8.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |