Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty
9.6%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,050,450 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 9.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in poverty level among married-couple families.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Yuman (9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 6.7%), Apache (9.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 9.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Crow Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.023% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 93.4% | 45.0% |
Range | 93.4% | 42.1% |
Mean | 31.7% | 14.0% |
Median | 10.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.1% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.8% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.6% | 10.8% |
Correlation Details
Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,413,053 | 5.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 280,256 | 5.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 161,288 | 4.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 92,589 | 5.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 7,096 | 2.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 48,050 | 4.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 1,520 | 3.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,750 | 5.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 634 | 45.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 4,860 | 16.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 4.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 4,223 | 26.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 729 | 8.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 36.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 24.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 176 | 13.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 27.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 9.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 10.4% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.75% | 3,985 | 12.5% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 10.3% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 19.6% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 3.1% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 13.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 7.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 27.7% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 25.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 8.0% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 25.8% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.45% | 473 | 7.0% |