Lumbee In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age > 16
56.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,293,168 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 56.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0038% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (56.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Tohono O'odham (57.2%, a difference of 0.85%), Pima (57.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (57.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and Puerto Rican (58.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 59.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 59.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 59.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 58.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 58.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 57.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 57.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 57.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 56.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.6% |
Lumbee In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 38.2% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 65.7% |
| Range | 84.9% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 22.3% | 51.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 51.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 45.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 56.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.0% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 6.9% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,479,898 | 65.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,807 | 62.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 59.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 120,266 | 57.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,868 | 56.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 54.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 57.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 59.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 45.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 50.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 43.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 47.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 39.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 55.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 51.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 1,417 | 52.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 38.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 62.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 47.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 46.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 55.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 58.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 51.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 50.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 42.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 56.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 42.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 42.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 55.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 55.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 40.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 47.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 43.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 44.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 51.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 46.4% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 51.7% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 51.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 53.1% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 47.6% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 51.9% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 44.3% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 45.6% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.59% | 147 | 62.2% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 53.7% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 62.7% |