Yuman Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yuman
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Yuman Married-Couple Family Poverty
9.7%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,644,577 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 9.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yuman and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yuman influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Yuman simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Crow (9.6%, a difference of 1.8%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 3.2%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), Apache (9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Yuman Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 79.5% | 26.2% |
| Range | 79.5% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 12.3% |
| Median | 8.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.5% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.2% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
| Yuman Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 40,016,771 | 6.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 493,342 | 6.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 45,945 | 5.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 28,790 | 7.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 3,277 | 12.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 689 | 9.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 19,282 | 9.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 9,106 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 8,708 | 2.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 527 | 13.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 5,447 | 17.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.36% | 4,895 | 20.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 362 | 15.8% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.71% | 1,370 | 3.6% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 120 | 14.3% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.95% | 630 | 26.2% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.23% | 1,967 | 14.5% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.47% | 1,867 | 18.5% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.49% | 1,482 | 22.0% |