Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Disability Age 65 to 74
Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74
32.7%
DISABILITY | AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,106,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 32.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0071% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |
Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Disability Age 65 to 74 Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 15.4% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 57.9% |
| Range | 84.9% | 42.5% |
| Mean | 21.4% | 36.3% |
| Median | 10.9% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 30.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 42.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.7% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 9.0% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,299,964 | 24.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,117,569 | 27.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,659 | 28.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 119,304 | 38.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 35.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 29.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 37.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 42.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 39.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 43.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 57.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 39.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 16.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 36.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 34.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 1,324 | 38.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 45.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 34.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 54.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 42.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 30.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 37.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 36.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 4,242 | 43.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 25.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 39.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 47.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 31.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 43.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 15.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 34.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 25.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 40.4% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 34.4% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 18.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 36.8% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 46.0% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 39.6% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 47.4% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 39.5% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 27.8% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 42.0% |