Lumbee Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Lumbee Single Male Poverty
25.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,687,707 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 25.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.49% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Puerto Rican (25.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (25.3%, a difference of 0.73%), Houma (23.5%, a difference of 7.3%), Crow (23.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and Hopi (27.5%, a difference of 9.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 25.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 25.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 27.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 81.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 81.5% | 98.1% |
Mean | 19.0% | 40.0% |
Median | 10.6% | 29.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 52.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 35.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 30.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 30.4% |
Correlation Details
Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 86,199,154 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 960,690 | 18.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 171,035 | 18.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 78,548 | 17.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 60,229 | 21.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 405 | 1.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 4,672 | 42.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.37% | 2,195 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 6,831 | 8.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 4,968 | 29.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 322 | 33.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 671 | 16.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.27% | 14,971 | 52.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 51.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.86% | 720 | 100.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 17.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 11.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 24,403 | 54.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.96% | 21,166 | 16.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.89% | 3,413 | 41.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 7.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 23.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 18.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 19.2% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 52.7% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 50.0% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 44.3% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 27.8% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 80.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 29.7% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 100.0% |