Lumbee Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Lumbee Female Poverty
23.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Lumbee and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Lumbee influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Lumbee simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |
Lumbee Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.041% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 84.9% | 65.5% |
| Range | 84.9% | 63.6% |
| Mean | 22.3% | 28.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.8% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.0% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 13.3% |
Correlation Details
| Lumbee Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 90,445,489 | 15.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,119,585 | 16.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 220,793 | 18.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 119,144 | 18.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 81,420 | 19.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 10,026 | 11.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 9,255 | 18.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 9,759 | 19.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 5,527 | 27.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 8,847 | 25.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 6,276 | 26.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 391 | 33.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.05% | 2,016 | 33.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 1,418 | 25.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 18,893 | 35.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 679 | 32.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 1,548 | 31.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 3,177 | 25.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 965 | 17.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 906 | 54.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 10,588 | 29.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 946 | 9.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.24% | 27,494 | 27.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.95% | 25,783 | 30.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,385 | 38.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.47% | 2,272 | 15.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 869 | 37.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 2,519 | 36.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.12% | 769 | 5.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58% | 34,093 | 28.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 3,118 | 38.8% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 316 | 62.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 65.5% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.53% | 9,790 | 33.9% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.84% | 37 | 45.5% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.67% | 11,548 | 33.2% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.93% | 5,065 | 40.8% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.45% | 97 | 1.9% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.00% | 300 | 35.6% |
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.01% | 6,499 | 33.2% |
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.71% | 29,670 | 29.2% |
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.12% | 264 | 41.7% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.19% | 12,346 | 27.9% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.59% | 147 | 33.3% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.54% | 650 | 7.0% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.92% | 305 | 13.9% |