Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
6.4%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 78.1% | 32.8% |
| Range | 78.0% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,204,578 | 5.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 246,935 | 6.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 49,634 | 6.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 9,067 | 9.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 46,698 | 4.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 6,215 | 4.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 22.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 7.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 8,346 | 8.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 12.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 6.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 1,257 | 4.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 11.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | 25.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 6.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 12.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 32.8% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 11.1% |