Yakama Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Yakama Married-Couple Family Poverty
9.0%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,842,420 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.847 and weighted average of 9.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.50% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yakama and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yakama influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Yakama simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Apache (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 3.0%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.3%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Yakama Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.033% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 40.1% |
Range | 56.5% | 37.1% |
Mean | 9.3% | 10.3% |
Median | 3.2% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 8.9% |
Correlation Details
Yakama Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.033% | 19,038,682 | 4.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 534,088 | 5.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 80,617 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 57,429 | 4.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 12,799 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 5,975 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 14,006 | 6.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 44,079 | 5.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.43% | 5,883 | 4.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 1,768 | 3.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 659 | 4.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,266 | 20.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 3,153 | 4.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 11,112 | 9.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 205 | 16.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.54% | 199 | 16.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 13,015 | 9.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.64% | 220 | 6.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 1,195 | 3.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 640 | 6.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.73% | 13,145 | 11.5% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.39% | 1,724 | 40.1% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.51% | 561 | 29.4% |