Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma

City Poverty vs State vs National
1. Mulberry 93.9% 15.2% (+78.7)#1 12.5% (+81.4)#129
2. Bee 89.7% 15.2% (+74.4)#2 12.5% (+77.1)#152
3. Oak Hill-Piney 81.8% 15.2% (+66.6)#3 12.5% (+69.3)#184
4. Rosston 80.6% 15.2% (+65.4)#4 12.5% (+68.1)#191
5. Butler 79.3% 15.2% (+64.1)#5 12.5% (+66.8)#203
6. Piney 73.9% 15.2% (+58.7)#6 12.5% (+61.4)#252
7. Jefferson 72.7% 15.2% (+57.5)#7 12.5% (+60.2)#272
8. Shamrock 65.9% 15.2% (+50.6)#8 12.5% (+53.3)#379
9. Platter 62.3% 15.2% (+47.0)#9 12.5% (+49.7)#458
10. Badger Lee 60.0% 15.2% (+44.8)#10 12.5% (+47.5)#519
11. Cooperton 60.0% 15.2% (+44.8)#11 12.5% (+47.5)#521
12. Emet 58.8% 15.2% (+43.6)#12 12.5% (+46.3)#548
13. New Woodville 57.1% 15.2% (+41.9)#13 12.5% (+44.6)#587
14. Deer Lick 56.5% 15.2% (+41.3)#14 12.5% (+44.0)#605
15. Knowles 54.5% 15.2% (+39.3)#15 12.5% (+42.0)#682
16. White Water 54.1% 15.2% (+38.8)#16 12.5% (+41.5)#702
17. Baker 52.6% 15.2% (+37.3)#17 12.5% (+40.0)#770
18. Monroe 52.3% 15.2% (+37.0)#18 12.5% (+39.7)#780
19. Mccurtain 52.0% 15.2% (+36.8)#19 12.5% (+39.5)#795
20. Tenkiller 51.8% 15.2% (+36.5)#20 12.5% (+39.2)#813
21. New Alluwe 51.6% 15.2% (+36.3)#21 12.5% (+39.0)#821
22. Dustin 51.4% 15.2% (+36.1)#22 12.5% (+38.8)#829
23. Elohim 51.4% 15.2% (+36.1)#23 12.5% (+38.8)#831
24. Bowring 51.2% 15.2% (+36.0)#24 12.5% (+38.7)#841
25. Atwood 49.5% 15.2% (+34.2)#25 12.5% (+36.9)#941
26. Boley 49.3% 15.2% (+34.1)#26 12.5% (+36.8)#953
27. Bell 49.0% 15.2% (+33.7)#27 12.5% (+36.4)#972
28. Grand Lake Towne 48.9% 15.2% (+33.7)#28 12.5% (+36.4)#975
29. Tyrone 48.9% 15.2% (+33.7)#29 12.5% (+36.4)#978
30. Hoyt 48.5% 15.2% (+33.2)#30 12.5% (+35.9)#1,006
31. Bennington 47.7% 15.2% (+32.5)#31 12.5% (+35.2)#1,042
32. Langston 47.0% 15.2% (+31.8)#32 12.5% (+34.5)#1,093
33. Hanna 47.0% 15.2% (+31.8)#33 12.5% (+34.5)#1,097
34. Boswell 46.9% 15.2% (+31.7)#34 12.5% (+34.4)#1,100
35. Douglas 46.9% 15.2% (+31.6)#35 12.5% (+34.3)#1,104
36. Byars 46.8% 15.2% (+31.6)#36 12.5% (+34.3)#1,108
37. Martha 46.5% 15.2% (+31.2)#37 12.5% (+33.9)#1,145
38. Moffett 46.4% 15.2% (+31.2)#38 12.5% (+33.9)#1,149
39. Avard 46.2% 15.2% (+30.9)#39 12.5% (+33.6)#1,171
40. Amorita 45.8% 15.2% (+30.6)#40 12.5% (+33.3)#1,192
41. Yeager 45.3% 15.2% (+30.1)#41 12.5% (+32.8)#1,227
42. Little Rock 44.8% 15.2% (+29.5)#42 12.5% (+32.2)#1,266
43. Bradley 44.6% 15.2% (+29.4)#43 12.5% (+32.1)#1,276
44. Fitzhugh 44.3% 15.2% (+29.1)#44 12.5% (+31.8)#1,302
45. Blue 43.6% 15.2% (+28.4)#45 12.5% (+31.1)#1,354
46. Elm Grove 43.5% 15.2% (+28.3)#46 12.5% (+31.0)#1,367
47. Whippoorwill 42.6% 15.2% (+27.3)#47 12.5% (+30.0)#1,461
48. Old Green 42.3% 15.2% (+27.1)#48 12.5% (+29.8)#1,474
49. Lima 42.0% 15.2% (+26.8)#49 12.5% (+29.5)#1,499
50. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 41.9% 15.2% (+26.6)#50 12.5% (+29.3)#1,518
51. White Eagle 41.8% 15.2% (+26.6)#51 12.5% (+29.3)#1,524
52. Yale 41.7% 15.2% (+26.4)#52 12.5% (+29.1)#1,551
53. Chewey 41.4% 15.2% (+26.1)#53 12.5% (+28.8)#1,574
54. Mutual 40.7% 15.2% (+25.5)#54 12.5% (+28.2)#1,611
55. Bunch 40.5% 15.2% (+25.3)#55 12.5% (+28.0)#1,629
56. Slick 40.2% 15.2% (+25.0)#56 12.5% (+27.7)#1,652
57. Wapanucka 40.2% 15.2% (+25.0)#57 12.5% (+27.7)#1,654
58. Lawrence Creek 39.3% 15.2% (+24.1)#58 12.5% (+26.8)#1,764
59. Moyers 38.9% 15.2% (+23.7)#59 12.5% (+26.4)#1,796
60. Friendship 38.5% 15.2% (+23.2)#60 12.5% (+25.9)#1,850
61. Rosedale 37.9% 15.2% (+22.7)#61 12.5% (+25.4)#1,916
62. Loyal 37.5% 15.2% (+22.3)#62 12.5% (+25.0)#1,979
63. Summit 37.3% 15.2% (+22.1)#63 12.5% (+24.8)#2,001
64. Okemah 37.2% 15.2% (+22.0)#64 12.5% (+24.7)#2,018
65. Heavener 37.2% 15.2% (+22.0)#65 12.5% (+24.7)#2,031
66. Reydon 37.0% 15.2% (+21.8)#66 12.5% (+24.5)#2,061
67. Cedar Crest 36.6% 15.2% (+21.3)#67 12.5% (+24.0)#2,125
68. Mcbride 36.1% 15.2% (+20.9)#68 12.5% (+23.6)#2,178
69. May 35.9% 15.2% (+20.7)#69 12.5% (+23.4)#2,216
70. Salina 35.7% 15.2% (+20.5)#70 12.5% (+23.2)#2,241
71. Tishomingo 35.7% 15.2% (+20.5)#71 12.5% (+23.2)#2,242
72. Nicut 35.6% 15.2% (+20.4)#72 12.5% (+23.1)#2,259
73. Cowlington 35.6% 15.2% (+20.3)#73 12.5% (+23.0)#2,270
74. Hobart 35.4% 15.2% (+20.2)#74 12.5% (+22.9)#2,298
75. Sallisaw 35.2% 15.2% (+20.0)#75 12.5% (+22.7)#2,325
76. Keota 35.0% 15.2% (+19.8)#76 12.5% (+22.5)#2,351
77. Boynton 35.0% 15.2% (+19.7)#77 12.5% (+22.4)#2,362
78. Dripping Springs 34.8% 15.2% (+19.6)#78 12.5% (+22.2)#2,389
79. Coalgate 34.5% 15.2% (+19.3)#79 12.5% (+22.0)#2,434
80. Weleetka 34.5% 15.2% (+19.2)#80 12.5% (+21.9)#2,440
81. Hugo 34.4% 15.2% (+19.2)#81 12.5% (+21.9)#2,457
82. Okeene 34.3% 15.2% (+19.0)#82 12.5% (+21.7)#2,479
83. Waurika 34.2% 15.2% (+19.0)#83 12.5% (+21.7)#2,485
84. Lowrey 34.2% 15.2% (+19.0)#84 12.5% (+21.7)#2,495
85. Lebanon 34.0% 15.2% (+18.7)#85 12.5% (+21.4)#2,537
86. Lake Ellsworth Addition 33.9% 15.2% (+18.7)#86 12.5% (+21.3)#2,552
87. Keys 33.6% 15.2% (+18.4)#87 12.5% (+21.0)#2,613
88. Cameron 33.6% 15.2% (+18.3)#88 12.5% (+21.0)#2,616
89. Depew 33.4% 15.2% (+18.2)#89 12.5% (+20.9)#2,639
90. Commerce 33.3% 15.2% (+18.1)#90 12.5% (+20.8)#2,646
91. Bache 33.3% 15.2% (+18.1)#91 12.5% (+20.8)#2,661
92. Tushka 33.0% 15.2% (+17.8)#92 12.5% (+20.5)#2,728
93. Quinton 33.0% 15.2% (+17.8)#93 12.5% (+20.4)#2,736
94. Blackburn 33.0% 15.2% (+17.7)#94 12.5% (+20.4)#2,738
95. Sportmans Shores 32.9% 15.2% (+17.7)#95 12.5% (+20.4)#2,751
96. Loco 32.9% 15.2% (+17.6)#96 12.5% (+20.3)#2,761
97. Billings 32.5% 15.2% (+17.3)#97 12.5% (+20.0)#2,835
98. Peggs 32.5% 15.2% (+17.2)#98 12.5% (+19.9)#2,842
99. Devol 32.3% 15.2% (+17.1)#99 12.5% (+19.8)#2,881
100. Broken Bow 32.3% 15.2% (+17.1)#100 12.5% (+19.8)#2,884

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma are:
#1
93.9%
#2
89.7%
#3
80.6%
#4
79.3%
#5
73.9%
#6
72.7%
#7
65.9%
#8
62.3%
#9
60.0%
#10
60.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Mulberry has the Highest Poverty Level in Oklahoma with 93.9%.
What is the Poverty Level in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level in Oklahoma is 15.2%.
What is the Poverty Level in the United States?
Poverty Level in the United States is 12.5%.