Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

20.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Johnson 1.3% 29.8% (-28.5)#1 24.1% (-22.7)#37
2. Temple 4.5% 29.8% (-25.3)#2 24.1% (-19.5)#578
3. Seiling 4.8% 29.8% (-25.1)#3 24.1% (-19.3)#637
4. Muldrow 5.3% 29.8% (-24.6)#4 24.1% (-18.8)#772
5. Caddo 5.3% 29.8% (-24.6)#5 24.1% (-18.8)#777
6. Zeb 5.3% 29.8% (-24.6)#6 24.1% (-18.8)#786
7. North Enid 5.6% 29.8% (-24.3)#7 24.1% (-18.5)#859
8. Lindsay 5.9% 29.8% (-23.9)#8 24.1% (-18.1)#989
9. Newcastle 6.1% 29.8% (-23.7)#9 24.1% (-17.9)#1,049
10. Hooker 6.2% 29.8% (-23.6)#10 24.1% (-17.8)#1,082
11. Cashion 6.2% 29.8% (-23.6)#11 24.1% (-17.8)#1,085
12. Castle 7.1% 29.8% (-22.7)#12 24.1% (-16.9)#1,393
13. Katie 7.3% 29.8% (-22.5)#13 24.1% (-16.8)#1,439
14. Luther 7.4% 29.8% (-22.4)#14 24.1% (-16.7)#1,470
15. Glenpool 7.5% 29.8% (-22.3)#15 24.1% (-16.5)#1,519
16. Silo 7.7% 29.8% (-22.2)#16 24.1% (-16.4)#1,585
17. Randlett 7.7% 29.8% (-22.2)#17 24.1% (-16.4)#1,592
18. Pink 8.3% 29.8% (-21.5)#18 24.1% (-15.7)#1,798
19. Medicine Park 8.3% 29.8% (-21.5)#19 24.1% (-15.7)#1,833
20. Barnsdall 8.6% 29.8% (-21.3)#20 24.1% (-15.5)#1,901
21. Tuttle 9.1% 29.8% (-20.8)#21 24.1% (-15.0)#2,049
22. Earlsboro 9.1% 29.8% (-20.8)#22 24.1% (-15.0)#2,080
23. Glencoe 9.1% 29.8% (-20.8)#23 24.1% (-15.0)#2,082
24. Mustang 9.2% 29.8% (-20.7)#24 24.1% (-14.9)#2,126
25. Hulbert 9.3% 29.8% (-20.5)#25 24.1% (-14.8)#2,169
26. Talihina 9.4% 29.8% (-20.4)#26 24.1% (-14.7)#2,204
27. Paden 9.5% 29.8% (-20.3)#27 24.1% (-14.6)#2,248
28. Blair 9.7% 29.8% (-20.1)#28 24.1% (-14.4)#2,323
29. Burlington 10.0% 29.8% (-19.8)#29 24.1% (-14.1)#2,460
30. Marble City 10.0% 29.8% (-19.8)#30 24.1% (-14.1)#2,461
31. Tatums 10.0% 29.8% (-19.8)#31 24.1% (-14.1)#2,463
32. Laverne 10.2% 29.8% (-19.6)#32 24.1% (-13.9)#2,511
33. Waukomis 10.3% 29.8% (-19.6)#33 24.1% (-13.8)#2,530
34. Kremlin 10.5% 29.8% (-19.3)#34 24.1% (-13.6)#2,655
35. Boise City 11.1% 29.8% (-18.7)#35 24.1% (-13.0)#2,874
36. Washington 11.1% 29.8% (-18.7)#36 24.1% (-13.0)#2,882
37. Bowlegs 11.1% 29.8% (-18.7)#37 24.1% (-13.0)#2,898
38. Dougherty 11.1% 29.8% (-18.7)#38 24.1% (-13.0)#2,916
39. Union City 11.6% 29.8% (-18.2)#39 24.1% (-12.4)#3,078
40. Eakly 11.8% 29.8% (-18.1)#40 24.1% (-12.3)#3,142
41. Tryon 12.0% 29.8% (-17.8)#41 24.1% (-12.1)#3,235
42. Sand Springs 12.2% 29.8% (-17.7)#42 24.1% (-11.9)#3,277
43. Purcell 12.6% 29.8% (-17.3)#43 24.1% (-11.5)#3,468
44. Roland 12.6% 29.8% (-17.2)#44 24.1% (-11.4)#3,488
45. Skiatook 12.7% 29.8% (-17.1)#45 24.1% (-11.3)#3,517
46. New Cordell 12.8% 29.8% (-17.0)#46 24.1% (-11.3)#3,554
47. Kenwood 12.9% 29.8% (-16.9)#47 24.1% (-11.1)#3,604
48. Alex 13.1% 29.8% (-16.7)#48 24.1% (-11.0)#3,670
49. Agra 13.3% 29.8% (-16.5)#49 24.1% (-10.7)#3,774
50. Prue 13.6% 29.8% (-16.2)#50 24.1% (-10.4)#3,902
51. Holdenville 13.8% 29.8% (-16.1)#51 24.1% (-10.3)#3,937
52. Owasso 13.8% 29.8% (-16.0)#52 24.1% (-10.2)#3,966
53. Kansas 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#53 24.1% (-9.79)#4,138
54. Olustee 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#54 24.1% (-9.79)#4,144
55. Goltry 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#55 24.1% (-9.79)#4,182
56. Red Rock 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#56 24.1% (-9.79)#4,193
57. Grayson 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#57 24.1% (-9.79)#4,206
58. Leon 14.3% 29.8% (-15.6)#58 24.1% (-9.79)#4,208
59. Broken Arrow 14.4% 29.8% (-15.4)#59 24.1% (-9.67)#4,234
60. Turley 14.5% 29.8% (-15.4)#60 24.1% (-9.61)#4,245
61. Geronimo 14.6% 29.8% (-15.3)#61 24.1% (-9.49)#4,291
62. Mulhall 14.6% 29.8% (-15.2)#62 24.1% (-9.44)#4,317
63. Stonewall 14.8% 29.8% (-15.0)#63 24.1% (-9.26)#4,390
64. Hydro 14.9% 29.8% (-15.0)#64 24.1% (-9.18)#4,411
65. Cement 15.0% 29.8% (-14.8)#65 24.1% (-9.08)#4,460
66. Wickliffe 15.3% 29.8% (-14.6)#66 24.1% (-8.82)#4,540
67. Latta 15.3% 29.8% (-14.6)#67 24.1% (-8.80)#4,548
68. Tyrone 15.4% 29.8% (-14.5)#68 24.1% (-8.69)#4,595
69. Meno 15.4% 29.8% (-14.5)#69 24.1% (-8.69)#4,632
70. Stroud 15.5% 29.8% (-14.4)#70 24.1% (-8.61)#4,658
71. Cole 15.8% 29.8% (-14.1)#71 24.1% (-8.29)#4,781
72. Indiahoma 16.0% 29.8% (-13.8)#72 24.1% (-8.08)#4,872
73. Beaver 16.4% 29.8% (-13.4)#73 24.1% (-7.66)#5,013
74. Perry 16.5% 29.8% (-13.3)#74 24.1% (-7.57)#5,042
75. Mannsville 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#75 24.1% (-7.41)#5,107
76. Remy 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#76 24.1% (-7.41)#5,128
77. Canton 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#77 24.1% (-7.41)#5,137
78. Oktaha 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#78 24.1% (-7.41)#5,171
79. Davidson 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#79 24.1% (-7.41)#5,178
80. Stuart 16.7% 29.8% (-13.2)#80 24.1% (-7.41)#5,197
81. Yukon 16.8% 29.8% (-13.1)#81 24.1% (-7.30)#5,229
82. Vinita 16.9% 29.8% (-13.0)#82 24.1% (-7.18)#5,267
83. Jenks 17.1% 29.8% (-12.8)#83 24.1% (-6.99)#5,334
84. Grandfield 17.5% 29.8% (-12.3)#84 24.1% (-6.53)#5,534
85. Schulter 17.6% 29.8% (-12.2)#85 24.1% (-6.43)#5,577
86. Mill Creek 18.2% 29.8% (-11.7)#86 24.1% (-5.89)#5,823
87. Fairland 18.3% 29.8% (-11.5)#87 24.1% (-5.74)#5,870
88. Coweta 18.5% 29.8% (-11.3)#88 24.1% (-5.57)#5,922
89. Fort Supply 18.5% 29.8% (-11.3)#89 24.1% (-5.56)#5,936
90. Brushy 18.6% 29.8% (-11.2)#90 24.1% (-5.47)#5,965
91. Oakhurst 18.8% 29.8% (-11.1)#91 24.1% (-5.33)#6,024
92. Tipton 18.8% 29.8% (-11.1)#92 24.1% (-5.33)#6,039
93. Gage 18.8% 29.8% (-11.1)#93 24.1% (-5.33)#6,046
94. Long 18.8% 29.8% (-11.1)#94 24.1% (-5.33)#6,048
95. Thackerville 19.0% 29.8% (-10.8)#95 24.1% (-5.03)#6,169
96. Valley Brook 20.0% 29.8% (-9.85)#96 24.1% (-4.08)#6,536
97. Davenport 20.0% 29.8% (-9.85)#97 24.1% (-4.08)#6,547
98. Lahoma 20.0% 29.8% (-9.85)#98 24.1% (-4.08)#6,551
99. Ketchum 20.0% 29.8% (-9.85)#99 24.1% (-4.08)#6,565
100. Winchester 20.0% 29.8% (-9.85)#100 24.1% (-4.08)#6,566

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma are:
#1
1.3%
#2
4.5%
#3
4.8%
#4
5.3%
#5
5.3%
#6
5.3%
#7
5.6%
#8
5.9%
#9
6.1%
#10
6.2%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Johnson has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma with 1.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.