Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma

30.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Seiling 4.9% 39.0% (-34.1)#1 33.1% (-28.3)#277
2. Katie 5.4% 39.0% (-33.6)#2 33.1% (-27.7)#353
3. Zeb 5.7% 39.0% (-33.3)#3 33.1% (-27.4)#403
4. North Enid 6.9% 39.0% (-32.1)#4 33.1% (-26.2)#582
5. Temple 7.1% 39.0% (-31.9)#5 33.1% (-26.0)#617
6. Hulbert 7.1% 39.0% (-31.9)#6 33.1% (-26.0)#627
7. Hooker 7.4% 39.0% (-31.6)#7 33.1% (-25.7)#670
8. Lindsay 8.9% 39.0% (-30.2)#8 33.1% (-24.3)#961
9. Vinita 9.8% 39.0% (-29.2)#9 33.1% (-23.3)#1,130
10. Glenpool 10.0% 39.0% (-29.0)#10 33.1% (-23.1)#1,154
11. Boise City 11.1% 39.0% (-27.9)#11 33.1% (-22.0)#1,411
12. Caddo 11.1% 39.0% (-27.9)#12 33.1% (-22.0)#1,414
13. Washington 11.8% 39.0% (-27.2)#13 33.1% (-21.4)#1,563
14. Kremlin 11.8% 39.0% (-27.2)#14 33.1% (-21.4)#1,575
15. Newcastle 12.0% 39.0% (-27.0)#15 33.1% (-21.2)#1,611
16. Silo 12.5% 39.0% (-26.5)#16 33.1% (-20.6)#1,745
17. Kenwood 12.7% 39.0% (-26.3)#17 33.1% (-20.4)#1,795
18. Blair 13.0% 39.0% (-26.1)#18 33.1% (-20.2)#1,851
19. Luther 13.8% 39.0% (-25.2)#19 33.1% (-19.3)#2,047
20. Copan 14.0% 39.0% (-25.1)#20 33.1% (-19.2)#2,079
21. Olustee 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#21 33.1% (-18.8)#2,165
22. Eakly 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#22 33.1% (-18.8)#2,171
23. Amber 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#23 33.1% (-18.8)#2,175
24. Soper 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#24 33.1% (-18.8)#2,193
25. Red Rock 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#25 33.1% (-18.8)#2,198
26. Owasso 14.3% 39.0% (-24.7)#26 33.1% (-18.8)#2,208
27. Roland 15.3% 39.0% (-23.7)#27 33.1% (-17.8)#2,395
28. Canton 15.4% 39.0% (-23.6)#28 33.1% (-17.8)#2,435
29. Mustang 15.6% 39.0% (-23.4)#29 33.1% (-17.5)#2,480
30. Cashion 15.8% 39.0% (-23.2)#30 33.1% (-17.3)#2,529
31. Westport 16.7% 39.0% (-22.3)#31 33.1% (-16.5)#2,786
32. Goltry 16.7% 39.0% (-22.3)#32 33.1% (-16.5)#2,797
33. Davidson 16.7% 39.0% (-22.3)#33 33.1% (-16.5)#2,806
34. Oktaha 17.6% 39.0% (-21.4)#34 33.1% (-15.5)#3,001
35. Grandfield 17.9% 39.0% (-21.2)#35 33.1% (-15.3)#3,058
36. Alva 18.2% 39.0% (-20.8)#36 33.1% (-15.0)#3,118
37. Agra 18.2% 39.0% (-20.8)#37 33.1% (-15.0)#3,152
38. Paden 18.2% 39.0% (-20.8)#38 33.1% (-15.0)#3,166
39. Geronimo 18.4% 39.0% (-20.6)#39 33.1% (-14.7)#3,217
40. Davenport 18.5% 39.0% (-20.5)#40 33.1% (-14.6)#3,238
41. Sand Springs 19.1% 39.0% (-19.9)#41 33.1% (-14.1)#3,395
42. New Cordell 19.2% 39.0% (-19.8)#42 33.1% (-13.9)#3,422
43. Broken Arrow 19.5% 39.0% (-19.5)#43 33.1% (-13.6)#3,507
44. Skiatook 19.9% 39.0% (-19.1)#44 33.1% (-13.2)#3,571
45. Asher 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#45 33.1% (-13.1)#3,651
46. Earlsboro 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#46 33.1% (-13.1)#3,653
47. Ralston 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#47 33.1% (-13.1)#3,664
48. Stuart 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#48 33.1% (-13.1)#3,689
49. Kenefic 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#49 33.1% (-13.1)#3,694
50. Grayson 20.0% 39.0% (-19.0)#50 33.1% (-13.1)#3,697
51. Hydro 20.6% 39.0% (-18.4)#51 33.1% (-12.5)#3,811
52. Fort Supply 20.8% 39.0% (-18.2)#52 33.1% (-12.3)#3,898
53. Holdenville 21.1% 39.0% (-17.9)#53 33.1% (-12.0)#3,966
54. Cement 21.4% 39.0% (-17.6)#54 33.1% (-11.7)#4,053
55. Hanson 21.4% 39.0% (-17.6)#55 33.1% (-11.7)#4,069
56. Davis 21.5% 39.0% (-17.5)#56 33.1% (-11.6)#4,081
57. Apache 21.9% 39.0% (-17.1)#57 33.1% (-11.3)#4,175
58. Stroud 22.0% 39.0% (-17.0)#58 33.1% (-11.2)#4,201
59. Beaver 22.0% 39.0% (-17.0)#59 33.1% (-11.1)#4,210
60. Belfonte 22.2% 39.0% (-16.8)#60 33.1% (-10.9)#4,308
61. Brushy 22.9% 39.0% (-16.2)#61 33.1% (-10.3)#4,440
62. Hammon 23.1% 39.0% (-15.9)#62 33.1% (-10.1)#4,512
63. Schulter 23.5% 39.0% (-15.5)#63 33.1% (-9.61)#4,628
64. Chattanooga 23.5% 39.0% (-15.5)#64 33.1% (-9.61)#4,631
65. Jenks 23.8% 39.0% (-15.2)#65 33.1% (-9.33)#4,690
66. Laverne 23.8% 39.0% (-15.2)#66 33.1% (-9.33)#4,703
67. Yukon 24.2% 39.0% (-14.8)#67 33.1% (-8.91)#4,803
68. Wellston 24.3% 39.0% (-14.7)#68 33.1% (-8.81)#4,823
69. Texanna 24.6% 39.0% (-14.4)#69 33.1% (-8.52)#4,889
70. Madill 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#70 33.1% (-8.14)#4,963
71. Goldsby 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#71 33.1% (-8.14)#4,971
72. Okarche 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#72 33.1% (-8.14)#4,991
73. Lahoma 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#73 33.1% (-8.14)#5,031
74. Mill Creek 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#74 33.1% (-8.14)#5,083
75. Meno 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#75 33.1% (-8.14)#5,089
76. Carter 25.0% 39.0% (-14.0)#76 33.1% (-8.14)#5,105
77. Coweta 25.2% 39.0% (-13.9)#77 33.1% (-7.98)#5,135
78. Dibble 25.8% 39.0% (-13.2)#78 33.1% (-7.33)#5,276
79. Newkirk 26.0% 39.0% (-13.0)#79 33.1% (-7.16)#5,326
80. Purcell 26.3% 39.0% (-12.7)#80 33.1% (-6.82)#5,401
81. Pink 26.3% 39.0% (-12.7)#81 33.1% (-6.82)#5,402
82. Verdigris 26.6% 39.0% (-12.4)#82 33.1% (-6.55)#5,466
83. Bixby 26.6% 39.0% (-12.4)#83 33.1% (-6.52)#5,475
84. Norman 27.1% 39.0% (-11.9)#84 33.1% (-6.04)#5,606
85. Wickliffe 27.3% 39.0% (-11.7)#85 33.1% (-5.86)#5,660
86. Valley Brook 27.3% 39.0% (-11.7)#86 33.1% (-5.86)#5,661
87. Blanchard 27.5% 39.0% (-11.5)#87 33.1% (-5.60)#5,741
88. Ketchum 27.8% 39.0% (-11.2)#88 33.1% (-5.36)#5,822
89. Durant 27.8% 39.0% (-11.2)#89 33.1% (-5.33)#5,837
90. Fort Gibson 27.9% 39.0% (-11.1)#90 33.1% (-5.22)#5,861
91. Rocky Mountain 28.1% 39.0% (-10.9)#91 33.1% (-5.01)#5,925
92. Dickson 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#92 33.1% (-4.56)#6,038
93. Waukomis 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#93 33.1% (-4.56)#6,045
94. Morrison 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#94 33.1% (-4.56)#6,061
95. Billings 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#95 33.1% (-4.56)#6,081
96. Stonewall 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#96 33.1% (-4.56)#6,088
97. Marland 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#97 33.1% (-4.56)#6,109
98. Gracemont 28.6% 39.0% (-10.4)#98 33.1% (-4.56)#6,111
99. Weatherford 29.1% 39.0% (-9.95)#99 33.1% (-4.07)#6,210
100. Union City 29.4% 39.0% (-9.60)#100 33.1% (-3.72)#6,287

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma are:
#1
4.9%
#2
5.4%
#3
5.7%
#4
6.9%
#5
7.1%
#6
7.1%
#7
7.4%
#8
8.9%
#9
9.8%
#10
10.0%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma?
Seiling has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma with 4.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma is 39.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.