Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utilities
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Loveland 100.0% 1.3% (+98.7)#1 0.84% (+99.2)#9
2. Washita 48.9% 1.3% (+47.6)#2 0.84% (+48.1)#36
3. Gate 45.5% 1.3% (+44.2)#3 0.84% (+44.6)#41
4. Byron 42.9% 1.3% (+41.6)#4 0.84% (+42.0)#44
5. Manitou 42.2% 1.3% (+40.9)#5 0.84% (+41.4)#45
6. May 37.5% 1.3% (+36.2)#6 0.84% (+36.7)#58
7. Brooksville 36.8% 1.3% (+35.6)#7 0.84% (+36.0)#60
8. Deer Lick 30.0% 1.3% (+28.7)#8 0.84% (+29.2)#80
9. Spaulding 29.4% 1.3% (+28.1)#9 0.84% (+28.6)#85
10. Hanson 28.2% 1.3% (+26.9)#10 0.84% (+27.4)#94
11. Vera 24.6% 1.3% (+23.3)#11 0.84% (+23.7)#120
12. Foster 24.5% 1.3% (+23.2)#12 0.84% (+23.7)#121
13. Orlando 23.1% 1.3% (+21.8)#13 0.84% (+22.2)#132
14. Tipton 17.0% 1.3% (+15.8)#14 0.84% (+16.2)#225
15. Terlton 16.7% 1.3% (+15.4)#15 0.84% (+15.8)#239
16. Grainola 16.7% 1.3% (+15.4)#16 0.84% (+15.8)#240
17. Dwight Mission 16.7% 1.3% (+15.4)#17 0.84% (+15.8)#241
18. Cyril 16.6% 1.3% (+15.3)#18 0.84% (+15.8)#243
19. Sterling 14.3% 1.3% (+13.0)#19 0.84% (+13.4)#311
20. Golden 13.6% 1.3% (+12.4)#20 0.84% (+12.8)#336
21. Grant 12.6% 1.3% (+11.4)#21 0.84% (+11.8)#377
22. Zeb 11.2% 1.3% (+9.94)#22 0.84% (+10.4)#453
23. Enterprise 10.7% 1.3% (+9.44)#23 0.84% (+9.88)#480
24. Sweetwater 10.6% 1.3% (+9.34)#24 0.84% (+9.77)#484
25. Taloga 10.3% 1.3% (+9.05)#25 0.84% (+9.48)#501
26. Sasakwa 10.0% 1.3% (+8.73)#26 0.84% (+9.16)#527
27. Phillips 9.8% 1.3% (+8.49)#27 0.84% (+8.92)#547
28. Lost City 9.6% 1.3% (+8.31)#28 0.84% (+8.74)#567
29. Laverne 9.6% 1.3% (+8.30)#29 0.84% (+8.74)#568
30. Whitehorn Cove 9.6% 1.3% (+8.29)#30 0.84% (+8.72)#570
31. Leedey 9.5% 1.3% (+8.25)#31 0.84% (+8.69)#572
32. Rose 9.5% 1.3% (+8.25)#32 0.84% (+8.69)#574
33. Leon 9.5% 1.3% (+8.25)#33 0.84% (+8.69)#575
34. Lane 9.1% 1.3% (+7.82)#34 0.84% (+8.25)#603
35. Dry Creek 8.8% 1.3% (+7.55)#35 0.84% (+7.99)#627
36. Stoney Point 8.7% 1.3% (+7.43)#36 0.84% (+7.86)#639
37. Pond Creek 8.5% 1.3% (+7.20)#37 0.84% (+7.63)#673
38. Fort Cobb 8.4% 1.3% (+7.14)#38 0.84% (+7.57)#679
39. Cement 8.4% 1.3% (+7.10)#39 0.84% (+7.53)#683
40. Ochelata 8.3% 1.3% (+7.01)#40 0.84% (+7.44)#689
41. Indianola 8.1% 1.3% (+6.84)#41 0.84% (+7.27)#714
42. Millerton 7.9% 1.3% (+6.59)#42 0.84% (+7.03)#748
43. Lawrence Creek 7.7% 1.3% (+6.42)#43 0.84% (+6.86)#771
44. Cherokee 7.7% 1.3% (+6.40)#44 0.84% (+6.83)#773
45. Hooker 7.6% 1.3% (+6.33)#45 0.84% (+6.76)#779
46. Byng 7.3% 1.3% (+6.07)#46 0.84% (+6.51)#817
47. Lone Wolf 7.0% 1.3% (+5.76)#47 0.84% (+6.19)#854
48. Thomas 7.0% 1.3% (+5.75)#48 0.84% (+6.18)#855
49. Slick 7.0% 1.3% (+5.75)#49 0.84% (+6.18)#859
50. Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County 6.7% 1.3% (+5.43)#50 0.84% (+5.86)#922
51. Soper 6.7% 1.3% (+5.40)#51 0.84% (+5.83)#935
52. Wanette 6.7% 1.3% (+5.40)#52 0.84% (+5.83)#936
53. Lequire 6.7% 1.3% (+5.40)#53 0.84% (+5.83)#940
54. Avant 6.5% 1.3% (+5.25)#54 0.84% (+5.68)#972
55. Blackburn 6.5% 1.3% (+5.18)#55 0.84% (+5.61)#992
56. Cimarron City 6.3% 1.3% (+5.08)#56 0.84% (+5.51)#1,015
57. Okarche 6.2% 1.3% (+4.98)#57 0.84% (+5.41)#1,031
58. Apache 6.1% 1.3% (+4.79)#58 0.84% (+5.22)#1,085
59. Canadian Shores 5.8% 1.3% (+4.53)#59 0.84% (+4.96)#1,165
60. Pocasset 5.8% 1.3% (+4.53)#60 0.84% (+4.96)#1,167
61. New Cordell 5.7% 1.3% (+4.46)#61 0.84% (+4.89)#1,192
62. Binger 5.7% 1.3% (+4.44)#62 0.84% (+4.88)#1,196
63. Haworth 5.7% 1.3% (+4.44)#63 0.84% (+4.88)#1,198
64. Osage 5.7% 1.3% (+4.44)#64 0.84% (+4.88)#1,200
65. White Oak 5.6% 1.3% (+4.36)#65 0.84% (+4.80)#1,220
66. Red Rock 5.6% 1.3% (+4.29)#66 0.84% (+4.72)#1,244
67. Nichols Hills 5.4% 1.3% (+4.17)#67 0.84% (+4.60)#1,278
68. Mooreland 5.3% 1.3% (+4.00)#68 0.84% (+4.44)#1,338
69. Yale 5.2% 1.3% (+3.94)#69 0.84% (+4.38)#1,364
70. Fairfax 5.1% 1.3% (+3.86)#70 0.84% (+4.29)#1,407
71. Disney 5.1% 1.3% (+3.86)#71 0.84% (+4.29)#1,409
72. Anadarko 5.0% 1.3% (+3.69)#72 0.84% (+4.12)#1,483
73. Francis 4.9% 1.3% (+3.59)#73 0.84% (+4.02)#1,530
74. Alex 4.8% 1.3% (+3.51)#74 0.84% (+3.95)#1,559
75. Gideon 4.7% 1.3% (+3.45)#75 0.84% (+3.88)#1,597
76. Geary 4.7% 1.3% (+3.42)#76 0.84% (+3.85)#1,611
77. Pocola 4.7% 1.3% (+3.40)#77 0.84% (+3.83)#1,626
78. Hennessey 4.5% 1.3% (+3.22)#78 0.84% (+3.65)#1,737
79. Checotah 4.5% 1.3% (+3.20)#79 0.84% (+3.63)#1,747
80. Lamont 4.5% 1.3% (+3.20)#80 0.84% (+3.63)#1,751
81. Granite 4.4% 1.3% (+3.15)#81 0.84% (+3.58)#1,777
82. Spencer 4.4% 1.3% (+3.11)#82 0.84% (+3.55)#1,797
83. Hanna 4.3% 1.3% (+3.08)#83 0.84% (+3.51)#1,829
84. Rocky Point 4.3% 1.3% (+3.02)#84 0.84% (+3.45)#1,851
85. Sawyer 4.3% 1.3% (+3.02)#85 0.84% (+3.45)#1,857
86. Tupelo 4.3% 1.3% (+3.00)#86 0.84% (+3.44)#1,865
87. Sequoyah 4.3% 1.3% (+2.99)#87 0.84% (+3.42)#1,869
88. Copeland 4.2% 1.3% (+2.97)#88 0.84% (+3.40)#1,879
89. Chattanooga 4.2% 1.3% (+2.92)#89 0.84% (+3.35)#1,907
90. Fitzhugh 4.2% 1.3% (+2.90)#90 0.84% (+3.33)#1,925
91. Atwood 4.2% 1.3% (+2.90)#91 0.84% (+3.33)#1,933
92. Erick 4.1% 1.3% (+2.87)#92 0.84% (+3.30)#1,948
93. Tushka 4.1% 1.3% (+2.82)#93 0.84% (+3.26)#1,973
94. Kiefer 4.0% 1.3% (+2.78)#94 0.84% (+3.21)#2,009
95. Taylor Ferry 4.0% 1.3% (+2.76)#95 0.84% (+3.20)#2,019
96. Cartwright 4.0% 1.3% (+2.73)#96 0.84% (+3.16)#2,032
97. Remy 4.0% 1.3% (+2.69)#97 0.84% (+3.13)#2,065
98. Kaw City 4.0% 1.3% (+2.69)#98 0.84% (+3.12)#2,070
99. Gage 3.9% 1.3% (+2.68)#99 0.84% (+3.11)#2,078
100. Sportsmen Acres 3.9% 1.3% (+2.65)#100 0.84% (+3.08)#2,097

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
45.5%
#3
42.9%
#4
42.2%
#5
37.5%
#6
36.8%
#7
30.0%
#8
29.4%
#9
24.6%
#10
24.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma?
Loveland has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in Oklahoma is 1.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Utilities in the United States is 0.84%.