Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

60.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Gowen 20.0% 65.9% (-45.9)#1 64.8% (-44.8)#212
2. Old Green 20.4% 65.9% (-45.6)#2 64.8% (-44.5)#220
3. Oak Grove 22.6% 65.9% (-43.4)#3 64.8% (-42.2)#265
4. Lake Ellsworth Addition 27.3% 65.9% (-38.7)#4 64.8% (-37.5)#374
5. Tushka 28.4% 65.9% (-37.5)#5 64.8% (-36.4)#411
6. Bowring 29.3% 65.9% (-36.7)#6 64.8% (-35.5)#448
7. Lakeside 29.5% 65.9% (-36.5)#7 64.8% (-35.3)#457
8. Tullahassee 33.3% 65.9% (-32.6)#8 64.8% (-31.5)#638
9. Amorita 33.3% 65.9% (-32.6)#9 64.8% (-31.5)#641
10. Dodge 35.0% 65.9% (-30.9)#10 64.8% (-29.8)#716
11. Sweetwater 36.1% 65.9% (-29.8)#11 64.8% (-28.7)#800
12. Elm Grove 37.0% 65.9% (-28.9)#12 64.8% (-27.8)#874
13. Stillwater 37.4% 65.9% (-28.5)#13 64.8% (-27.4)#910
14. Olustee 39.2% 65.9% (-26.7)#14 64.8% (-25.6)#1,061
15. Fair Oaks 39.6% 65.9% (-26.4)#15 64.8% (-25.2)#1,095
16. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 41.4% 65.9% (-24.5)#16 64.8% (-23.4)#1,295
17. Nashoba 41.7% 65.9% (-24.3)#17 64.8% (-23.1)#1,316
18. Hulbert 41.9% 65.9% (-24.0)#18 64.8% (-22.9)#1,344
19. Tahlequah 42.5% 65.9% (-23.5)#19 64.8% (-22.4)#1,428
20. Stilwell 43.3% 65.9% (-22.6)#20 64.8% (-21.5)#1,531
21. Ada 43.6% 65.9% (-22.3)#21 64.8% (-21.2)#1,582
22. Hugo 43.6% 65.9% (-22.3)#22 64.8% (-21.2)#1,584
23. Sportsmen Acres 44.0% 65.9% (-21.9)#23 64.8% (-20.8)#1,637
24. Okemah 44.0% 65.9% (-21.9)#24 64.8% (-20.8)#1,639
25. Valley Brook 44.3% 65.9% (-21.6)#25 64.8% (-20.5)#1,674
26. Mutual 44.4% 65.9% (-21.5)#26 64.8% (-20.4)#1,712
27. Lawton 44.7% 65.9% (-21.2)#27 64.8% (-20.1)#1,747
28. Westville 45.1% 65.9% (-20.9)#28 64.8% (-19.8)#1,811
29. Burns Flat 45.2% 65.9% (-20.8)#29 64.8% (-19.7)#1,824
30. Konawa 45.3% 65.9% (-20.6)#30 64.8% (-19.5)#1,848
31. Slick 45.5% 65.9% (-20.5)#31 64.8% (-19.4)#1,872
32. Durant 45.8% 65.9% (-20.1)#32 64.8% (-19.0)#1,925
33. Milfay 46.2% 65.9% (-19.8)#33 64.8% (-18.7)#1,979
34. Clayton 46.8% 65.9% (-19.2)#34 64.8% (-18.1)#2,096
35. Mulberry 47.4% 65.9% (-18.6)#35 64.8% (-17.4)#2,220
36. Bristow 47.6% 65.9% (-18.4)#36 64.8% (-17.2)#2,262
37. Connerville 47.6% 65.9% (-18.3)#37 64.8% (-17.2)#2,276
38. Goodwell 47.8% 65.9% (-18.2)#38 64.8% (-17.0)#2,312
39. Gracemont 47.9% 65.9% (-18.1)#39 64.8% (-16.9)#2,334
40. Tishomingo 47.9% 65.9% (-18.0)#40 64.8% (-16.9)#2,348
41. Weatherford 48.7% 65.9% (-17.3)#41 64.8% (-16.1)#2,514
42. Calera 48.7% 65.9% (-17.2)#42 64.8% (-16.1)#2,523
43. New Alluwe 48.7% 65.9% (-17.2)#43 64.8% (-16.1)#2,526
44. Langston 49.1% 65.9% (-16.9)#44 64.8% (-15.8)#2,630
45. Proctor 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#45 64.8% (-14.8)#2,871
46. Bee 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#46 64.8% (-14.8)#2,877
47. Murphy 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#47 64.8% (-14.8)#2,878
48. Reagan 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#48 64.8% (-14.8)#2,899
49. Knowles 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#49 64.8% (-14.8)#2,912
50. Loveland 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#50 64.8% (-14.8)#2,916
51. Wewoka 50.0% 65.9% (-15.9)#51 64.8% (-14.8)#2,925
52. Vera 50.3% 65.9% (-15.6)#52 64.8% (-14.5)#2,960
53. Vian 50.3% 65.9% (-15.6)#53 64.8% (-14.5)#2,963
54. Oak Hill-Piney 50.9% 65.9% (-15.1)#54 64.8% (-13.9)#3,107
55. Kemp 50.9% 65.9% (-15.0)#55 64.8% (-13.9)#3,126
56. Steely Hollow 51.0% 65.9% (-15.0)#56 64.8% (-13.8)#3,132
57. Stigler 51.0% 65.9% (-14.9)#57 64.8% (-13.8)#3,152
58. Sayre 51.2% 65.9% (-14.8)#58 64.8% (-13.7)#3,192
59. Blair 51.3% 65.9% (-14.6)#59 64.8% (-13.5)#3,251
60. Okmulgee 51.3% 65.9% (-14.6)#60 64.8% (-13.5)#3,252
61. Talihina 51.7% 65.9% (-14.3)#61 64.8% (-13.1)#3,346
62. Spiro 51.9% 65.9% (-14.1)#62 64.8% (-13.0)#3,401
63. Taft 51.9% 65.9% (-14.0)#63 64.8% (-12.9)#3,426
64. Chickasha 52.0% 65.9% (-13.9)#64 64.8% (-12.8)#3,452
65. Bethany 52.1% 65.9% (-13.8)#65 64.8% (-12.7)#3,479
66. Salina 52.2% 65.9% (-13.8)#66 64.8% (-12.7)#3,496
67. Idabel 52.2% 65.9% (-13.7)#67 64.8% (-12.6)#3,521
68. Tulsa 52.3% 65.9% (-13.7)#68 64.8% (-12.6)#3,535
69. Warner 52.3% 65.9% (-13.7)#69 64.8% (-12.5)#3,538
70. Norman 52.4% 65.9% (-13.6)#70 64.8% (-12.4)#3,571
71. Cushing 52.4% 65.9% (-13.5)#71 64.8% (-12.4)#3,597
72. Colcord 52.5% 65.9% (-13.5)#72 64.8% (-12.3)#3,613
73. Broken Bow 52.5% 65.9% (-13.4)#73 64.8% (-12.3)#3,622
74. Cheyenne 52.6% 65.9% (-13.3)#74 64.8% (-12.2)#3,647
75. Sallisaw 52.7% 65.9% (-13.3)#75 64.8% (-12.1)#3,670
76. Pauls Valley 52.8% 65.9% (-13.2)#76 64.8% (-12.0)#3,704
77. Francis 53.2% 65.9% (-12.7)#77 64.8% (-11.6)#3,854
78. Watonga 53.4% 65.9% (-12.5)#78 64.8% (-11.4)#3,920
79. Wapanucka 53.5% 65.9% (-12.4)#79 64.8% (-11.3)#3,950
80. Coleman 53.6% 65.9% (-12.4)#80 64.8% (-11.2)#3,962
81. Seminole 53.9% 65.9% (-12.1)#81 64.8% (-10.9)#4,062
82. Antlers 53.9% 65.9% (-12.0)#82 64.8% (-10.9)#4,078
83. Claremore 54.0% 65.9% (-11.9)#83 64.8% (-10.8)#4,119
84. Stratford 54.1% 65.9% (-11.8)#84 64.8% (-10.7)#4,160
85. Coalgate 54.4% 65.9% (-11.5)#85 64.8% (-10.4)#4,237
86. Isabella 54.5% 65.9% (-11.4)#86 64.8% (-10.3)#4,287
87. Moffett 54.5% 65.9% (-11.4)#87 64.8% (-10.3)#4,288
88. Wynnewood 54.8% 65.9% (-11.2)#88 64.8% (-10.0)#4,379
89. Davis 54.8% 65.9% (-11.1)#89 64.8% (-10.0)#4,384
90. Loyal 54.8% 65.9% (-11.1)#90 64.8% (-9.98)#4,401
91. Reydon 54.9% 65.9% (-11.0)#91 64.8% (-9.89)#4,432
92. Headrick 55.0% 65.9% (-10.9)#92 64.8% (-9.82)#4,462
93. Jay 55.1% 65.9% (-10.9)#93 64.8% (-9.75)#4,477
94. Cedar Crest 55.1% 65.9% (-10.9)#94 64.8% (-9.73)#4,484
95. Hanson 55.1% 65.9% (-10.8)#95 64.8% (-9.71)#4,491
96. Pryor Creek 55.1% 65.9% (-10.8)#96 64.8% (-9.71)#4,495
97. Wyandotte 55.1% 65.9% (-10.8)#97 64.8% (-9.69)#4,501
98. Meeker 55.3% 65.9% (-10.6)#98 64.8% (-9.49)#4,571
99. Nowata 55.4% 65.9% (-10.6)#99 64.8% (-9.44)#4,592
100. Quapaw 55.6% 65.9% (-10.3)#100 64.8% (-9.19)#4,684

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma are:
#1
20.0%
#2
20.4%
#3
22.6%
#4
28.4%
#5
33.3%
#6
33.3%
#7
35.0%
#8
36.1%
#9
37.0%
#10
37.4%
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Gowen has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma with 20.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 65.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.