Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Office & Administration
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Quay 100.0% 11.5% (+88.5)#1 10.9% (+89.1)#49
2. Fay 60.0% 11.5% (+48.5)#2 10.9% (+49.1)#128
3. Clarita 58.1% 11.5% (+46.5)#3 10.9% (+47.2)#135
4. Lake Ellsworth Addition 57.0% 11.5% (+45.4)#4 10.9% (+46.1)#145
5. Putnam 53.3% 11.5% (+41.8)#5 10.9% (+42.5)#176
6. Zion 53.3% 11.5% (+41.8)#6 10.9% (+42.5)#177
7. Blue 51.4% 11.5% (+39.9)#7 10.9% (+40.6)#194
8. Hanson 51.3% 11.5% (+39.7)#8 10.9% (+40.4)#195
9. Bowring 48.6% 11.5% (+37.0)#9 10.9% (+37.7)#242
10. Lovell 48.0% 11.5% (+36.5)#10 10.9% (+37.1)#247
11. Foster 45.1% 11.5% (+33.6)#11 10.9% (+34.2)#290
12. Leonard 42.9% 11.5% (+31.3)#12 10.9% (+32.0)#334
13. Foss 41.9% 11.5% (+30.3)#13 10.9% (+31.0)#367
14. Clearview 40.0% 11.5% (+28.5)#14 10.9% (+29.1)#414
15. Briartown 39.1% 11.5% (+27.6)#15 10.9% (+28.3)#440
16. Spaulding 37.3% 11.5% (+25.7)#16 10.9% (+26.4)#491
17. Evening Shade 35.7% 11.5% (+24.2)#17 10.9% (+24.9)#544
18. Gotebo 35.5% 11.5% (+24.0)#18 10.9% (+24.7)#549
19. Hoffman 34.5% 11.5% (+22.9)#19 10.9% (+23.6)#596
20. Kansas 34.0% 11.5% (+22.4)#20 10.9% (+23.1)#617
21. Narcissa 33.3% 11.5% (+21.8)#21 10.9% (+22.5)#651
22. Hitchcock 33.3% 11.5% (+21.8)#22 10.9% (+22.5)#677
23. Wetumka 32.6% 11.5% (+21.0)#23 10.9% (+21.7)#709
24. Mazie 31.7% 11.5% (+20.2)#24 10.9% (+20.9)#746
25. Agra 31.0% 11.5% (+19.4)#25 10.9% (+20.1)#785
26. Castle 30.8% 11.5% (+19.2)#26 10.9% (+19.9)#798
27. Ixl 30.8% 11.5% (+19.2)#27 10.9% (+19.9)#801
28. Notchietown 30.7% 11.5% (+19.2)#28 10.9% (+19.8)#805
29. Pump Back 30.2% 11.5% (+18.7)#29 10.9% (+19.4)#831
30. Colony 29.5% 11.5% (+18.0)#30 10.9% (+18.7)#875
31. Fairfield 29.4% 11.5% (+17.9)#31 10.9% (+18.6)#881
32. Cumberland 29.1% 11.5% (+17.6)#32 10.9% (+18.2)#910
33. Cowlington 28.6% 11.5% (+17.0)#33 10.9% (+17.7)#955
34. Bridge Creek 28.5% 11.5% (+17.0)#34 10.9% (+17.7)#967
35. Mountain Park 28.0% 11.5% (+16.5)#35 10.9% (+17.1)#1,002
36. Pocasset 27.5% 11.5% (+16.0)#36 10.9% (+16.7)#1,060
37. Zena 27.5% 11.5% (+16.0)#37 10.9% (+16.6)#1,064
38. Longdale 27.4% 11.5% (+15.9)#38 10.9% (+16.6)#1,069
39. Deer Creek 27.0% 11.5% (+15.5)#39 10.9% (+16.2)#1,104
40. Lima 26.9% 11.5% (+15.4)#40 10.9% (+16.1)#1,114
41. Carlisle 26.7% 11.5% (+15.1)#41 10.9% (+15.8)#1,138
42. Fargo 26.5% 11.5% (+14.9)#42 10.9% (+15.6)#1,159
43. Nashoba 26.3% 11.5% (+14.8)#43 10.9% (+15.5)#1,177
44. Nardin 24.6% 11.5% (+13.1)#44 10.9% (+13.8)#1,372
45. Katie 24.3% 11.5% (+12.8)#45 10.9% (+13.5)#1,416
46. Smith Village 24.2% 11.5% (+12.7)#46 10.9% (+13.4)#1,430
47. Haywood 24.1% 11.5% (+12.5)#47 10.9% (+13.2)#1,450
48. Forest Park 24.0% 11.5% (+12.5)#48 10.9% (+13.2)#1,458
49. Camargo 23.9% 11.5% (+12.4)#49 10.9% (+13.1)#1,466
50. Albion 23.8% 11.5% (+12.3)#50 10.9% (+13.0)#1,493
51. Dale 23.7% 11.5% (+12.2)#51 10.9% (+12.9)#1,504
52. Turley 23.7% 11.5% (+12.2)#52 10.9% (+12.9)#1,509
53. Dover 23.7% 11.5% (+12.1)#53 10.9% (+12.8)#1,517
54. Fort Supply 23.6% 11.5% (+12.1)#54 10.9% (+12.8)#1,520
55. Porum 23.6% 11.5% (+12.1)#55 10.9% (+12.8)#1,522
56. Morrison 23.6% 11.5% (+12.1)#56 10.9% (+12.7)#1,533
57. Red Rock 23.3% 11.5% (+11.8)#57 10.9% (+12.5)#1,578
58. Council Hill 23.3% 11.5% (+11.8)#58 10.9% (+12.5)#1,581
59. Fittstown 23.3% 11.5% (+11.8)#59 10.9% (+12.5)#1,584
60. Davidson 23.2% 11.5% (+11.7)#60 10.9% (+12.4)#1,597
61. Grandfield 23.2% 11.5% (+11.7)#61 10.9% (+12.4)#1,603
62. Orlando 23.1% 11.5% (+11.5)#62 10.9% (+12.2)#1,621
63. Sayre 22.8% 11.5% (+11.3)#63 10.9% (+12.0)#1,665
64. Caddo 22.8% 11.5% (+11.3)#64 10.9% (+12.0)#1,666
65. Olive 22.7% 11.5% (+11.2)#65 10.9% (+11.9)#1,689
66. Morris 22.6% 11.5% (+11.1)#66 10.9% (+11.7)#1,707
67. Coleman 22.3% 11.5% (+10.8)#67 10.9% (+11.4)#1,777
68. Francis 22.2% 11.5% (+10.7)#68 10.9% (+11.4)#1,787
69. Box 22.2% 11.5% (+10.7)#69 10.9% (+11.4)#1,797
70. Peoria 22.2% 11.5% (+10.7)#70 10.9% (+11.4)#1,800
71. Oakhurst 22.1% 11.5% (+10.5)#71 10.9% (+11.2)#1,825
72. Bryant 21.4% 11.5% (+9.89)#72 10.9% (+10.6)#1,996
73. Pumpkin Hollow 21.2% 11.5% (+9.61)#73 10.9% (+10.3)#2,060
74. Union City 21.0% 11.5% (+9.43)#74 10.9% (+10.1)#2,106
75. Velma 20.9% 11.5% (+9.36)#75 10.9% (+10.0)#2,125
76. Fletcher 20.8% 11.5% (+9.29)#76 10.9% (+9.98)#2,141
77. Dewar 20.7% 11.5% (+9.21)#77 10.9% (+9.89)#2,172
78. Apache 20.5% 11.5% (+8.97)#78 10.9% (+9.66)#2,244
79. Taft 20.5% 11.5% (+8.97)#79 10.9% (+9.66)#2,249
80. Stonewall 20.4% 11.5% (+8.84)#80 10.9% (+9.52)#2,284
81. Langston 20.3% 11.5% (+8.74)#81 10.9% (+9.43)#2,313
82. Pond Creek 20.2% 11.5% (+8.69)#82 10.9% (+9.38)#2,324
83. Grant 20.0% 11.5% (+8.46)#83 10.9% (+9.14)#2,407
84. Burlington 20.0% 11.5% (+8.46)#84 10.9% (+9.14)#2,416
85. Centrahoma 20.0% 11.5% (+8.46)#85 10.9% (+9.14)#2,435
86. Walters 19.9% 11.5% (+8.38)#86 10.9% (+9.06)#2,460
87. Mcloud 19.8% 11.5% (+8.21)#87 10.9% (+8.90)#2,518
88. Savanna 19.7% 11.5% (+8.20)#88 10.9% (+8.89)#2,522
89. Short 19.7% 11.5% (+8.20)#89 10.9% (+8.88)#2,525
90. Oaks 19.7% 11.5% (+8.16)#90 10.9% (+8.84)#2,533
91. Fitzhugh 19.4% 11.5% (+7.90)#91 10.9% (+8.59)#2,629
92. Murphy 19.1% 11.5% (+7.61)#92 10.9% (+8.29)#2,742
93. Cimarron City 19.0% 11.5% (+7.51)#93 10.9% (+8.19)#2,783
94. Oktaha 19.0% 11.5% (+7.42)#94 10.9% (+8.11)#2,817
95. New Eucha 18.8% 11.5% (+7.31)#95 10.9% (+7.99)#2,885
96. Paoli 18.8% 11.5% (+7.26)#96 10.9% (+7.94)#2,912
97. Carrier 18.6% 11.5% (+7.06)#97 10.9% (+7.75)#3,020
98. Kellyville 18.5% 11.5% (+6.92)#98 10.9% (+7.61)#3,104
99. White Oak 18.3% 11.5% (+6.77)#99 10.9% (+7.45)#3,172
100. Hennepin 18.3% 11.5% (+6.75)#100 10.9% (+7.44)#3,184

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma are:
#1
58.1%
#2
53.3%
#3
53.3%
#4
51.4%
#5
45.1%
#6
41.9%
#7
40.0%
#8
37.3%
#9
35.7%
#10
35.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma?
Clarita has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma with 58.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in Oklahoma is 11.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Office & Administration in the United States is 10.9%.