Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 75+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Caney 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#1 11.1% (+88.9)#94
2. Turpin 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#2 11.1% (+88.9)#104
3. Chewey 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#3 11.1% (+88.9)#112
4. Bell 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#4 11.1% (+88.9)#113
5. Proctor 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#5 11.1% (+88.9)#182
6. Whitesboro 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#6 11.1% (+88.9)#214
7. Enterprise 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#7 11.1% (+88.9)#217
8. Mcbride 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#8 11.1% (+88.9)#264
9. Moffett 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#9 11.1% (+88.9)#312
10. Swink 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#10 11.1% (+88.9)#331
11. Terlton 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#11 11.1% (+88.9)#332
12. Bunch 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#12 11.1% (+88.9)#353
13. Rosedale 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#13 11.1% (+88.9)#365
14. Jefferson 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#14 11.1% (+88.9)#389
15. Bradley 95.5% 9.7% (+85.7)#15 11.1% (+84.4)#401
16. Titanic 92.3% 9.7% (+82.6)#16 11.1% (+81.2)#414
17. Lake Ellsworth Addition 89.3% 9.7% (+79.6)#17 11.1% (+78.2)#427
18. Summit 83.3% 9.7% (+73.6)#18 11.1% (+72.3)#466
19. Grand Lake Towne 80.6% 9.7% (+70.8)#19 11.1% (+69.5)#485
20. Mccurtain 80.0% 9.7% (+70.3)#20 11.1% (+68.9)#488
21. Lima 75.0% 9.7% (+65.3)#21 11.1% (+63.9)#568
22. Peggs 68.2% 9.7% (+58.5)#22 11.1% (+57.1)#646
23. Boynton 66.7% 9.7% (+57.0)#23 11.1% (+55.6)#689
24. Manchester 66.7% 9.7% (+57.0)#24 11.1% (+55.6)#691
25. Gerty 66.7% 9.7% (+57.0)#25 11.1% (+55.6)#704
26. Smith Village 66.7% 9.7% (+57.0)#26 11.1% (+55.6)#707
27. Nicut 64.3% 9.7% (+54.6)#27 11.1% (+53.2)#729
28. Tatums 62.5% 9.7% (+52.8)#28 11.1% (+51.4)#773
29. Medford 62.3% 9.7% (+52.6)#29 11.1% (+51.2)#783
30. Zeb 60.0% 9.7% (+50.3)#30 11.1% (+48.9)#838
31. Le Flore 60.0% 9.7% (+50.3)#31 11.1% (+48.9)#856
32. Sour John 60.0% 9.7% (+50.3)#32 11.1% (+48.9)#862
33. Bromide 57.7% 9.7% (+48.0)#33 11.1% (+46.6)#929
34. Winchester 57.5% 9.7% (+47.8)#34 11.1% (+46.4)#930
35. Keys 57.4% 9.7% (+47.7)#35 11.1% (+46.3)#935
36. Olive 55.6% 9.7% (+45.8)#36 11.1% (+44.5)#1,010
37. Talihina 55.3% 9.7% (+45.6)#37 11.1% (+44.2)#1,019
38. Roosevelt 54.5% 9.7% (+44.8)#38 11.1% (+43.5)#1,042
39. Big Cabin 53.3% 9.7% (+43.6)#39 11.1% (+42.3)#1,087
40. Fitzhugh 53.0% 9.7% (+43.3)#40 11.1% (+42.0)#1,098
41. Tushka 51.9% 9.7% (+42.2)#41 11.1% (+40.9)#1,124
42. Ringling 51.6% 9.7% (+41.9)#42 11.1% (+40.5)#1,132
43. Pond Creek 51.4% 9.7% (+41.6)#43 11.1% (+40.3)#1,146
44. Depew 51.1% 9.7% (+41.4)#44 11.1% (+40.0)#1,154
45. Briggs 51.0% 9.7% (+41.3)#45 11.1% (+40.0)#1,157
46. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#46 11.1% (+38.9)#1,210
47. Canadian Shores 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#47 11.1% (+38.9)#1,222
48. Cedar Crest 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#48 11.1% (+38.9)#1,227
49. Lebanon 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#49 11.1% (+38.9)#1,240
50. Lamar 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#50 11.1% (+38.9)#1,242
51. Blackburn 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#51 11.1% (+38.9)#1,286
52. Allen 49.4% 9.7% (+39.7)#52 11.1% (+38.3)#1,322
53. Rock Island 49.3% 9.7% (+39.6)#53 11.1% (+38.2)#1,323
54. Boswell 48.3% 9.7% (+38.6)#54 11.1% (+37.3)#1,357
55. Pettit 48.0% 9.7% (+38.3)#55 11.1% (+36.9)#1,376
56. Cottonwood 47.4% 9.7% (+37.7)#56 11.1% (+36.3)#1,419
57. Fair Oaks 46.7% 9.7% (+37.0)#57 11.1% (+35.6)#1,464
58. Lequire 45.5% 9.7% (+35.7)#58 11.1% (+34.4)#1,535
59. Panola 45.5% 9.7% (+35.7)#59 11.1% (+34.4)#1,537
60. Foyil 43.8% 9.7% (+34.0)#60 11.1% (+32.7)#1,622
61. Dill City 42.9% 9.7% (+33.1)#61 11.1% (+31.8)#1,698
62. Taft 42.9% 9.7% (+33.1)#62 11.1% (+31.8)#1,711
63. Centrahoma 42.9% 9.7% (+33.1)#63 11.1% (+31.8)#1,714
64. Keyes 41.7% 9.7% (+32.0)#64 11.1% (+30.6)#1,797
65. West Peavine 41.2% 9.7% (+31.5)#65 11.1% (+30.1)#1,834
66. Delaware 40.7% 9.7% (+31.0)#66 11.1% (+29.7)#1,854
67. Glencoe 40.6% 9.7% (+30.9)#67 11.1% (+29.5)#1,865
68. Sunray 40.3% 9.7% (+30.5)#68 11.1% (+29.2)#1,885
69. Chandler 40.1% 9.7% (+30.4)#69 11.1% (+29.1)#1,890
70. Calvin 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#70 11.1% (+28.9)#1,913
71. Coleman 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#71 11.1% (+28.9)#1,921
72. Milburn 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#72 11.1% (+28.9)#1,926
73. Bessie 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#73 11.1% (+28.9)#1,928
74. Sparks 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#74 11.1% (+28.9)#1,943
75. Rentiesville 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#75 11.1% (+28.9)#1,948
76. Hanna 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#76 11.1% (+28.9)#1,953
77. Oakwood 40.0% 9.7% (+30.3)#77 11.1% (+28.9)#1,960
78. Dixon 38.9% 9.7% (+29.2)#78 11.1% (+27.8)#2,041
79. Blackwell 38.3% 9.7% (+28.6)#79 11.1% (+27.3)#2,096
80. Heavener 37.8% 9.7% (+28.1)#80 11.1% (+26.7)#2,142
81. Rocky Mountain 37.5% 9.7% (+27.8)#81 11.1% (+26.4)#2,165
82. Atwood 37.5% 9.7% (+27.8)#82 11.1% (+26.4)#2,186
83. Chester 37.5% 9.7% (+27.8)#83 11.1% (+26.4)#2,191
84. Oaks 36.4% 9.7% (+26.7)#84 11.1% (+25.3)#2,282
85. Addington 36.4% 9.7% (+26.7)#85 11.1% (+25.3)#2,293
86. Hendrix 36.4% 9.7% (+26.7)#86 11.1% (+25.3)#2,296
87. Fairfield 35.7% 9.7% (+26.0)#87 11.1% (+24.6)#2,332
88. Taloga 35.7% 9.7% (+26.0)#88 11.1% (+24.6)#2,340
89. Valliant 35.6% 9.7% (+25.9)#89 11.1% (+24.5)#2,355
90. Bennington 35.3% 9.7% (+25.6)#90 11.1% (+24.2)#2,386
91. Fanshawe 35.1% 9.7% (+25.4)#91 11.1% (+24.1)#2,403
92. Lyons Switch 35.0% 9.7% (+25.3)#92 11.1% (+23.9)#2,412
93. Terral 34.5% 9.7% (+24.8)#93 11.1% (+23.4)#2,467
94. Waurika 34.4% 9.7% (+24.7)#94 11.1% (+23.3)#2,470
95. Union City 34.0% 9.7% (+24.3)#95 11.1% (+23.0)#2,506
96. Kellyville 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#96 11.1% (+22.3)#2,577
97. Davenport 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#97 11.1% (+22.3)#2,592
98. Paoli 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#98 11.1% (+22.3)#2,595
99. Covington 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#99 11.1% (+22.3)#2,620
100. Rose 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#100 11.1% (+22.3)#2,648

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma?
Caney has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in Oklahoma is 9.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 75 in the United States is 11.1%.