Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Firefighting & Prevention
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Lucien 30.9% 1.1% (+29.8)#1 1.2% (+29.7)#52
2. Dale 25.4% 1.1% (+24.4)#2 1.2% (+24.2)#73
3. Tiawah 16.3% 1.1% (+15.2)#3 1.2% (+15.1)#166
4. Greenville 15.4% 1.1% (+14.3)#4 1.2% (+14.2)#193
5. Little Rock 14.3% 1.1% (+13.2)#5 1.2% (+13.1)#224
6. Skedee 14.3% 1.1% (+13.2)#6 1.2% (+13.1)#227
7. Atwood 12.5% 1.1% (+11.4)#7 1.2% (+11.3)#295
8. Etowah 11.1% 1.1% (+10.0)#8 1.2% (+9.93)#364
9. Peavine 9.5% 1.1% (+8.42)#9 1.2% (+8.30)#456
10. Wyandotte 9.3% 1.1% (+8.21)#10 1.2% (+8.09)#473
11. Blanco 9.1% 1.1% (+8.02)#11 1.2% (+7.91)#497
12. Hitchita 9.1% 1.1% (+8.02)#12 1.2% (+7.91)#499
13. Flute Springs 8.3% 1.1% (+7.26)#13 1.2% (+7.15)#574
14. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 7.8% 1.1% (+6.77)#14 1.2% (+6.66)#639
15. Whitesboro 7.7% 1.1% (+6.62)#15 1.2% (+6.51)#660
16. Liberty 7.6% 1.1% (+6.55)#16 1.2% (+6.43)#668
17. Cave Spring 7.1% 1.1% (+6.07)#17 1.2% (+5.96)#736
18. West Peavine 7.0% 1.1% (+5.97)#18 1.2% (+5.86)#752
19. Pittsburg 6.8% 1.1% (+5.71)#19 1.2% (+5.59)#798
20. Stringtown 6.7% 1.1% (+5.67)#20 1.2% (+5.56)#803
21. Pin Oak Acres 6.7% 1.1% (+5.62)#21 1.2% (+5.50)#814
22. Erick 6.7% 1.1% (+5.62)#22 1.2% (+5.50)#815
23. Avant 6.5% 1.1% (+5.45)#23 1.2% (+5.34)#846
24. Latta 6.5% 1.1% (+5.39)#24 1.2% (+5.27)#859
25. Caddo 6.1% 1.1% (+5.06)#25 1.2% (+4.95)#916
26. White Eagle 6.1% 1.1% (+5.04)#26 1.2% (+4.93)#922
27. Alex 6.1% 1.1% (+5.02)#27 1.2% (+4.90)#929
28. Apache 6.1% 1.1% (+4.99)#28 1.2% (+4.87)#938
29. Oakwood 5.7% 1.1% (+4.64)#29 1.2% (+4.53)#1,041
30. White Oak 5.6% 1.1% (+4.56)#30 1.2% (+4.45)#1,061
31. Welch 5.6% 1.1% (+4.51)#31 1.2% (+4.40)#1,073
32. Welling 5.5% 1.1% (+4.44)#32 1.2% (+4.32)#1,093
33. Freedom 5.3% 1.1% (+4.25)#33 1.2% (+4.13)#1,162
34. Whitehorn Cove 5.1% 1.1% (+4.08)#34 1.2% (+3.96)#1,221
35. Wainwright 5.1% 1.1% (+4.06)#35 1.2% (+3.94)#1,226
36. Tyrone 5.0% 1.1% (+3.93)#36 1.2% (+3.81)#1,270
37. Bowlegs 4.8% 1.1% (+3.77)#37 1.2% (+3.65)#1,340
38. Wapanucka 4.8% 1.1% (+3.73)#38 1.2% (+3.61)#1,358
39. Wynnewood 4.7% 1.1% (+3.65)#39 1.2% (+3.54)#1,391
40. Cayuga 4.7% 1.1% (+3.62)#40 1.2% (+3.50)#1,408
41. Indiahoma 4.5% 1.1% (+3.48)#41 1.2% (+3.36)#1,471
42. Gate 4.5% 1.1% (+3.48)#42 1.2% (+3.36)#1,478
43. Yale 4.5% 1.1% (+3.43)#43 1.2% (+3.32)#1,504
44. Canadian Shores 4.3% 1.1% (+3.28)#44 1.2% (+3.16)#1,588
45. Gans 4.3% 1.1% (+3.24)#45 1.2% (+3.12)#1,616
46. Okmulgee 4.3% 1.1% (+3.24)#46 1.2% (+3.12)#1,619
47. Pettit 4.2% 1.1% (+3.14)#47 1.2% (+3.02)#1,667
48. Newkirk 4.0% 1.1% (+2.96)#48 1.2% (+2.84)#1,775
49. Braman 4.0% 1.1% (+2.93)#49 1.2% (+2.81)#1,801
50. Terral 3.9% 1.1% (+2.87)#50 1.2% (+2.75)#1,828
51. Spaulding 3.9% 1.1% (+2.85)#51 1.2% (+2.74)#1,837
52. Barnsdall 3.9% 1.1% (+2.84)#52 1.2% (+2.73)#1,842
53. Ringling 3.9% 1.1% (+2.82)#53 1.2% (+2.71)#1,857
54. Wagoner 3.8% 1.1% (+2.73)#54 1.2% (+2.62)#1,923
55. Waukomis 3.8% 1.1% (+2.71)#55 1.2% (+2.59)#1,947
56. Spencer 3.7% 1.1% (+2.62)#56 1.2% (+2.50)#2,036
57. Fort Coffee 3.7% 1.1% (+2.61)#57 1.2% (+2.49)#2,044
58. Verdigris 3.6% 1.1% (+2.55)#58 1.2% (+2.43)#2,101
59. Roff 3.6% 1.1% (+2.54)#59 1.2% (+2.43)#2,105
60. Blackwell 3.6% 1.1% (+2.54)#60 1.2% (+2.42)#2,119
61. Chouteau 3.4% 1.1% (+2.38)#61 1.2% (+2.26)#2,255
62. Oktaha 3.4% 1.1% (+2.38)#62 1.2% (+2.26)#2,257
63. Wanette 3.3% 1.1% (+2.26)#63 1.2% (+2.15)#2,379
64. Council Hill 3.3% 1.1% (+2.26)#64 1.2% (+2.15)#2,381
65. Flint Creek 3.2% 1.1% (+2.17)#65 1.2% (+2.05)#2,501
66. Lone Grove 3.2% 1.1% (+2.16)#66 1.2% (+2.04)#2,503
67. Cameron 3.2% 1.1% (+2.16)#67 1.2% (+2.04)#2,512
68. Tonkawa 3.1% 1.1% (+2.06)#68 1.2% (+1.94)#2,604
69. Grandfield 3.1% 1.1% (+2.00)#69 1.2% (+1.89)#2,671
70. Rock Island 3.1% 1.1% (+1.98)#70 1.2% (+1.87)#2,694
71. Muldrow 3.0% 1.1% (+1.97)#71 1.2% (+1.86)#2,707
72. Pink 3.0% 1.1% (+1.97)#72 1.2% (+1.86)#2,711
73. Oaks 3.0% 1.1% (+1.96)#73 1.2% (+1.84)#2,730
74. Sulphur 3.0% 1.1% (+1.93)#74 1.2% (+1.82)#2,762
75. Stroud 2.9% 1.1% (+1.87)#75 1.2% (+1.76)#2,859
76. Okemah 2.9% 1.1% (+1.86)#76 1.2% (+1.75)#2,877
77. Fort Gibson 2.9% 1.1% (+1.79)#77 1.2% (+1.68)#2,948
78. Jones 2.9% 1.1% (+1.79)#78 1.2% (+1.68)#2,953
79. Binger 2.9% 1.1% (+1.79)#79 1.2% (+1.67)#2,961
80. Ripley 2.8% 1.1% (+1.76)#80 1.2% (+1.64)#3,001
81. Jay 2.8% 1.1% (+1.74)#81 1.2% (+1.62)#3,026
82. Wilson 2.8% 1.1% (+1.71)#82 1.2% (+1.59)#3,073
83. Grayson 2.8% 1.1% (+1.71)#83 1.2% (+1.59)#3,083
84. Burneyville 2.7% 1.1% (+1.66)#84 1.2% (+1.54)#3,153
85. Gore 2.7% 1.1% (+1.62)#85 1.2% (+1.51)#3,201
86. Roland 2.7% 1.1% (+1.62)#86 1.2% (+1.51)#3,205
87. Dougherty 2.6% 1.1% (+1.56)#87 1.2% (+1.45)#3,298
88. Tuttle 2.6% 1.1% (+1.53)#88 1.2% (+1.41)#3,366
89. Fort Towson 2.6% 1.1% (+1.51)#89 1.2% (+1.39)#3,396
90. Cheyenne 2.6% 1.1% (+1.49)#90 1.2% (+1.38)#3,420
91. Gracemont 2.6% 1.1% (+1.49)#91 1.2% (+1.38)#3,422
92. Kemp 2.5% 1.1% (+1.46)#92 1.2% (+1.35)#3,494
93. Forest Park 2.5% 1.1% (+1.41)#93 1.2% (+1.29)#3,606
94. Lyons Switch 2.5% 1.1% (+1.40)#94 1.2% (+1.28)#3,620
95. Sportsmen Acres 2.5% 1.1% (+1.38)#95 1.2% (+1.27)#3,653
96. Carter 2.4% 1.1% (+1.37)#96 1.2% (+1.25)#3,678
97. Tatums 2.4% 1.1% (+1.37)#97 1.2% (+1.25)#3,679
98. Elgin 2.4% 1.1% (+1.35)#98 1.2% (+1.23)#3,718
99. Helena 2.4% 1.1% (+1.31)#99 1.2% (+1.20)#3,792
100. Inola 2.4% 1.1% (+1.31)#100 1.2% (+1.19)#3,807

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma are:
#1
30.9%
#2
25.4%
#3
16.3%
#4
14.3%
#5
12.5%
#6
11.1%
#7
9.5%
#8
9.3%
#9
9.1%
#10
9.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma?
Lucien has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma with 30.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in Oklahoma is 1.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Firefighting & Prevention in the United States is 1.2%.