Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Electrical Heating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma

City Electrical Heating vs State vs National
1. Lebanon 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#1 40.2% (+59.8)#200
2. Mcbride 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#2 40.2% (+59.8)#338
3. Earl 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#3 40.2% (+59.8)#345
4. Little 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#4 40.2% (+59.8)#365
5. Utica 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#5 40.2% (+59.8)#433
6. Shamrock 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#6 40.2% (+59.8)#439
7. Eagle 100.0% 40.5% (+59.5)#7 40.2% (+59.8)#533
8. Sportsmen Acres 96.9% 40.5% (+56.4)#8 40.2% (+56.7)#818
9. Washita 94.3% 40.5% (+53.8)#9 40.2% (+54.1)#1,240
10. Short 93.9% 40.5% (+53.4)#10 40.2% (+53.7)#1,306
11. Hochatown 91.3% 40.5% (+50.8)#11 40.2% (+51.1)#1,726
12. Cromwell 90.6% 40.5% (+50.1)#12 40.2% (+50.4)#1,842
13. Yeager 90.6% 40.5% (+50.1)#13 40.2% (+50.4)#1,844
14. Greenville 90.0% 40.5% (+49.5)#14 40.2% (+49.8)#1,950
15. Hollister 88.9% 40.5% (+48.4)#15 40.2% (+48.7)#2,117
16. Rosedale 88.9% 40.5% (+48.4)#16 40.2% (+48.7)#2,118
17. Macomb 88.9% 40.5% (+48.4)#17 40.2% (+48.7)#2,119
18. Bug Tussle 88.2% 40.5% (+47.7)#18 40.2% (+48.0)#2,230
19. Hanson 87.8% 40.5% (+47.3)#19 40.2% (+47.6)#2,277
20. Golden 87.5% 40.5% (+47.0)#20 40.2% (+47.3)#2,322
21. Akins 87.2% 40.5% (+46.7)#21 40.2% (+47.0)#2,372
22. Norge 87.0% 40.5% (+46.5)#22 40.2% (+46.8)#2,397
23. Silo 86.2% 40.5% (+45.7)#23 40.2% (+46.0)#2,503
24. Thackerville 85.9% 40.5% (+45.4)#24 40.2% (+45.7)#2,546
25. Paoli 85.8% 40.5% (+45.3)#25 40.2% (+45.6)#2,567
26. Panola 85.2% 40.5% (+44.7)#26 40.2% (+45.0)#2,654
27. Cumberland 84.5% 40.5% (+44.0)#27 40.2% (+44.3)#2,755
28. Hillsdale 83.9% 40.5% (+43.4)#28 40.2% (+43.7)#2,856
29. Garvin 83.3% 40.5% (+42.8)#29 40.2% (+43.1)#2,943
30. Hennepin 83.3% 40.5% (+42.8)#30 40.2% (+43.1)#2,944
31. Calvin 83.1% 40.5% (+42.6)#31 40.2% (+42.9)#2,976
32. Medicine Park 82.5% 40.5% (+42.0)#32 40.2% (+42.3)#3,055
33. Foster 82.1% 40.5% (+41.6)#33 40.2% (+41.9)#3,113
34. Centrahoma 82.1% 40.5% (+41.6)#34 40.2% (+41.9)#3,117
35. Cartwright 82.0% 40.5% (+41.5)#35 40.2% (+41.8)#3,122
36. Dickson 81.7% 40.5% (+41.2)#36 40.2% (+41.5)#3,171
37. Baker 81.5% 40.5% (+41.0)#37 40.2% (+41.3)#3,205
38. Armstrong 80.9% 40.5% (+40.4)#38 40.2% (+40.7)#3,298
39. Stuart 80.4% 40.5% (+39.9)#39 40.2% (+40.2)#3,380
40. Grand Lake Towne 80.3% 40.5% (+39.8)#40 40.2% (+40.1)#3,391
41. Brent 80.1% 40.5% (+39.6)#41 40.2% (+39.9)#3,419
42. Atwood 80.0% 40.5% (+39.5)#42 40.2% (+39.8)#3,448
43. Terlton 80.0% 40.5% (+39.5)#43 40.2% (+39.8)#3,451
44. Burneyville 79.4% 40.5% (+38.9)#44 40.2% (+39.2)#3,537
45. Randlett 79.0% 40.5% (+38.5)#45 40.2% (+38.8)#3,604
46. Stratford 78.0% 40.5% (+37.5)#46 40.2% (+37.8)#3,736
47. Caney 78.0% 40.5% (+37.5)#47 40.2% (+37.8)#3,741
48. Sugden 77.8% 40.5% (+37.3)#48 40.2% (+37.6)#3,780
49. Lone Grove 77.7% 40.5% (+37.2)#49 40.2% (+37.5)#3,788
50. Lawrence Creek 77.5% 40.5% (+37.0)#50 40.2% (+37.3)#3,833
51. Smithville 77.3% 40.5% (+36.8)#51 40.2% (+37.1)#3,862
52. Mannsville 77.1% 40.5% (+36.6)#52 40.2% (+36.9)#3,885
53. Chattanooga 77.1% 40.5% (+36.6)#53 40.2% (+36.9)#3,888
54. Emet 76.9% 40.5% (+36.4)#54 40.2% (+36.7)#3,922
55. May 76.9% 40.5% (+36.4)#55 40.2% (+36.7)#3,923
56. Dwight Mission 76.5% 40.5% (+36.0)#56 40.2% (+36.3)#3,990
57. Summit 75.7% 40.5% (+35.2)#57 40.2% (+35.5)#4,125
58. Fort Towson 75.5% 40.5% (+35.0)#58 40.2% (+35.3)#4,142
59. Clayton 75.2% 40.5% (+34.7)#59 40.2% (+35.0)#4,176
60. Wyandotte 75.1% 40.5% (+34.6)#60 40.2% (+34.9)#4,191
61. Katie 74.5% 40.5% (+34.0)#61 40.2% (+34.3)#4,290
62. Boswell 74.3% 40.5% (+33.8)#62 40.2% (+34.1)#4,329
63. Sasakwa 74.2% 40.5% (+33.7)#63 40.2% (+34.0)#4,354
64. Gene Autry 73.8% 40.5% (+33.3)#64 40.2% (+33.6)#4,411
65. Lawtonka Acres 73.8% 40.5% (+33.3)#65 40.2% (+33.6)#4,414
66. Long 73.6% 40.5% (+33.1)#66 40.2% (+33.4)#4,435
67. Dustin 73.3% 40.5% (+32.8)#67 40.2% (+33.1)#4,485
68. Sand Point 72.6% 40.5% (+32.1)#68 40.2% (+32.4)#4,590
69. Elmer 72.4% 40.5% (+31.9)#69 40.2% (+32.2)#4,632
70. Durant 72.3% 40.5% (+31.8)#70 40.2% (+32.1)#4,633
71. Calera 72.2% 40.5% (+31.7)#71 40.2% (+32.0)#4,651
72. Mead 72.0% 40.5% (+31.5)#72 40.2% (+31.8)#4,700
73. Arpelar 71.5% 40.5% (+31.0)#73 40.2% (+31.3)#4,782
74. Millerton 71.4% 40.5% (+30.9)#74 40.2% (+31.2)#4,801
75. Blue 71.4% 40.5% (+30.9)#75 40.2% (+31.2)#4,803
76. Vanoss 71.4% 40.5% (+30.9)#76 40.2% (+31.2)#4,811
77. Kenefic 71.1% 40.5% (+30.6)#77 40.2% (+30.9)#4,863
78. New Eucha 70.7% 40.5% (+30.2)#78 40.2% (+30.5)#4,911
79. Fort Coffee 70.6% 40.5% (+30.1)#79 40.2% (+30.4)#4,930
80. Christie 70.5% 40.5% (+30.0)#80 40.2% (+30.3)#4,960
81. Copeland 70.2% 40.5% (+29.7)#81 40.2% (+30.0)#4,993
82. Langley 70.2% 40.5% (+29.7)#82 40.2% (+30.0)#4,997
83. Ashland 69.6% 40.5% (+29.1)#83 40.2% (+29.4)#5,109
84. Roland 69.3% 40.5% (+28.8)#84 40.2% (+29.1)#5,139
85. Soper 69.2% 40.5% (+28.7)#85 40.2% (+29.0)#5,164
86. Ketchum 69.1% 40.5% (+28.6)#86 40.2% (+28.9)#5,180
87. Rock Island 68.9% 40.5% (+28.4)#87 40.2% (+28.7)#5,215
88. Avant 68.5% 40.5% (+28.0)#88 40.2% (+28.3)#5,291
89. Tishomingo 68.4% 40.5% (+27.9)#89 40.2% (+28.2)#5,301
90. Leon 68.3% 40.5% (+27.8)#90 40.2% (+28.1)#5,334
91. Dotyville 68.3% 40.5% (+27.8)#91 40.2% (+28.1)#5,335
92. Eagletown 68.2% 40.5% (+27.7)#92 40.2% (+28.0)#5,348
93. Adair 68.0% 40.5% (+27.5)#93 40.2% (+27.8)#5,379
94. Empire City 67.9% 40.5% (+27.4)#94 40.2% (+27.7)#5,396
95. Tamaha 67.8% 40.5% (+27.3)#95 40.2% (+27.6)#5,421
96. Idabel 67.6% 40.5% (+27.1)#96 40.2% (+27.4)#5,446
97. Lookeba 67.6% 40.5% (+27.1)#97 40.2% (+27.4)#5,462
98. Caddo 67.5% 40.5% (+27.0)#98 40.2% (+27.3)#5,474
99. Ravia 67.5% 40.5% (+27.0)#99 40.2% (+27.3)#5,477
100. Sawyer 67.5% 40.5% (+27.0)#100 40.2% (+27.3)#5,478

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
96.9%
#4
93.9%
#5
90.6%
#6
90.6%
#7
88.9%
#8
88.9%
#9
88.9%
#10
87.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma?
Lebanon has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in Oklahoma is 40.5%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States?
Percentage of Households Heated by Electricity in the United States is 40.2%.