Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Hispanic or Latino
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma

City Hispanic or Latino vs State vs National
1. Baker 91.8% 11.6% (+80.2)#1 18.7% (+73.1)#739
2. Mehan 91.2% 11.6% (+79.6)#2 18.7% (+72.5)#750
3. Optima 88.2% 11.6% (+76.6)#3 18.7% (+69.5)#826
4. Hardesty 86.9% 11.6% (+75.3)#4 18.7% (+68.2)#854
5. Eakly 68.3% 11.6% (+56.7)#5 18.7% (+49.6)#1,298
6. Rosston 67.7% 11.6% (+56.2)#6 18.7% (+49.1)#1,318
7. Adams 65.9% 11.6% (+54.3)#7 18.7% (+47.2)#1,380
8. Gate 64.4% 11.6% (+52.9)#8 18.7% (+45.8)#1,425
9. Tyrone 64.0% 11.6% (+52.5)#9 18.7% (+45.4)#1,433
10. Ringwood 58.5% 11.6% (+46.9)#10 18.7% (+39.8)#1,611
11. Guymon 55.3% 11.6% (+43.8)#11 18.7% (+36.7)#1,713
12. Little Ponderosa 52.8% 11.6% (+41.2)#12 18.7% (+34.1)#1,840
13. Bowring 51.2% 11.6% (+39.7)#13 18.7% (+32.6)#1,898
14. Olustee 50.5% 11.6% (+39.0)#14 18.7% (+31.9)#1,924
15. Hollis 45.0% 11.6% (+33.4)#15 18.7% (+26.3)#2,208
16. Texhoma 42.4% 11.6% (+30.9)#16 18.7% (+23.8)#2,368
17. Madill 42.0% 11.6% (+30.4)#17 18.7% (+23.3)#2,389
18. Marietta 38.5% 11.6% (+27.0)#18 18.7% (+19.9)#2,610
19. Boise City 37.8% 11.6% (+26.3)#19 18.7% (+19.2)#2,662
20. Martha 37.0% 11.6% (+25.5)#20 18.7% (+18.4)#2,710
21. Clinton 36.8% 11.6% (+25.2)#21 18.7% (+18.1)#2,727
22. Warr Acres 36.1% 11.6% (+24.6)#22 18.7% (+17.5)#2,796
23. Valley Park 35.7% 11.6% (+24.2)#23 18.7% (+17.1)#2,828
24. Heavener 35.6% 11.6% (+24.0)#24 18.7% (+16.9)#2,839
25. Gould 35.5% 11.6% (+23.9)#25 18.7% (+16.8)#2,848
26. Oakland 34.2% 11.6% (+22.7)#26 18.7% (+15.6)#2,958
27. Eldorado 34.0% 11.6% (+22.4)#27 18.7% (+15.3)#2,987
28. Frederick 33.7% 11.6% (+22.2)#28 18.7% (+15.1)#3,002
29. Marland 33.2% 11.6% (+21.7)#29 18.7% (+14.6)#3,058
30. Loyal 33.0% 11.6% (+21.5)#30 18.7% (+14.4)#3,072
31. Laverne 32.3% 11.6% (+20.7)#31 18.7% (+13.6)#3,143
32. Hooker 32.1% 11.6% (+20.5)#32 18.7% (+13.4)#3,159
33. Grandfield 32.0% 11.6% (+20.5)#33 18.7% (+13.4)#3,166
34. Lookeba 31.8% 11.6% (+20.3)#34 18.7% (+13.2)#3,192
35. Beaver 30.6% 11.6% (+19.1)#35 18.7% (+12.0)#3,324
36. Lebanon 30.2% 11.6% (+18.6)#36 18.7% (+11.5)#3,372
37. Hennessey 30.1% 11.6% (+18.6)#37 18.7% (+11.5)#3,378
38. Davidson 30.0% 11.6% (+18.4)#38 18.7% (+11.3)#3,400
39. Elm Grove 29.9% 11.6% (+18.3)#39 18.7% (+11.2)#3,409
40. Tipton 29.8% 11.6% (+18.2)#40 18.7% (+11.1)#3,429
41. Fitzhugh 29.1% 11.6% (+17.6)#41 18.7% (+10.5)#3,492
42. Forgan 29.0% 11.6% (+17.5)#42 18.7% (+10.4)#3,506
43. Hinton 28.7% 11.6% (+17.1)#43 18.7% (+10.0)#3,543
44. Altus 28.4% 11.6% (+16.9)#44 18.7% (+9.78)#3,575
45. Buffalo 28.4% 11.6% (+16.8)#45 18.7% (+9.71)#3,583
46. Norge 28.2% 11.6% (+16.6)#46 18.7% (+9.54)#3,608
47. Oak Grove 28.1% 11.6% (+16.6)#47 18.7% (+9.47)#3,614
48. Terral 27.6% 11.6% (+16.1)#48 18.7% (+8.96)#3,673
49. Lamont 27.0% 11.6% (+15.4)#49 18.7% (+8.31)#3,770
50. Drummond 26.9% 11.6% (+15.4)#50 18.7% (+8.29)#3,772
51. New Alluwe 25.0% 11.6% (+13.4)#51 18.7% (+6.35)#4,017
52. Elmer 25.0% 11.6% (+13.4)#52 18.7% (+6.35)#4,018
53. Commerce 24.8% 11.6% (+13.3)#53 18.7% (+6.15)#4,044
54. Keyes 23.7% 11.6% (+12.1)#54 18.7% (+5.00)#4,244
55. Dover 23.6% 11.6% (+12.1)#55 18.7% (+4.96)#4,249
56. Valley Brook 23.6% 11.6% (+12.0)#56 18.7% (+4.92)#4,259
57. Turpin 23.3% 11.6% (+11.8)#57 18.7% (+4.69)#4,304
58. Lima 23.2% 11.6% (+11.6)#58 18.7% (+4.54)#4,334
59. Watonga 21.8% 11.6% (+10.2)#59 18.7% (+3.11)#4,583
60. Lakeside 21.6% 11.6% (+10.0)#60 18.7% (+2.92)#4,621
61. Elk City 21.6% 11.6% (+10.0)#61 18.7% (+2.92)#4,622
62. Fargo 21.5% 11.6% (+9.95)#62 18.7% (+2.85)#4,635
63. Canute 20.9% 11.6% (+9.33)#63 18.7% (+2.23)#4,771
64. Meno 20.4% 11.6% (+8.80)#64 18.7% (+1.70)#4,884
65. Bessie 20.2% 11.6% (+8.69)#65 18.7% (+1.59)#4,909
66. Oklahoma City 20.1% 11.6% (+8.52)#66 18.7% (+1.42)#4,955
67. Roosevelt 19.8% 11.6% (+8.22)#67 18.7% (+1.12)#5,012
68. Pauls Valley 19.6% 11.6% (+8.06)#68 18.7% (+0.963)#5,055
69. Bethany 19.6% 11.6% (+8.03)#69 18.7% (+0.931)#5,064
70. Ryan 19.5% 11.6% (+7.99)#70 18.7% (+0.887)#5,081
71. Carnegie 18.9% 11.6% (+7.38)#71 18.7% (+0.276)#5,204
72. Kingfisher 18.9% 11.6% (+7.37)#72 18.7% (+0.269)#5,205
73. Cheyenne 18.5% 11.6% (+6.93)#73 18.7% (-0.170)#5,306
74. Dixon 18.5% 11.6% (+6.90)#74 18.7% (-0.199)#5,318
75. Hobart 18.2% 11.6% (+6.64)#75 18.7% (-0.459)#5,384
76. Stuart 18.1% 11.6% (+6.58)#76 18.7% (-0.523)#5,410
77. Murphy 18.1% 11.6% (+6.56)#77 18.7% (-0.536)#5,413
78. Wakita 17.9% 11.6% (+6.39)#78 18.7% (-0.711)#5,461
79. Park Hill 17.8% 11.6% (+6.21)#79 18.7% (-0.893)#5,512
80. Turley 17.6% 11.6% (+6.03)#80 18.7% (-1.07)#5,560
81. Goodwell 17.5% 11.6% (+5.92)#81 18.7% (-1.18)#5,586
82. Mountain Park 17.4% 11.6% (+5.80)#82 18.7% (-1.30)#5,624
83. Elgin 17.4% 11.6% (+5.80)#83 18.7% (-1.30)#5,626
84. Tulsa 17.3% 11.6% (+5.77)#84 18.7% (-1.33)#5,637
85. El Reno 17.2% 11.6% (+5.68)#85 18.7% (-1.41)#5,661
86. Arapaho 17.1% 11.6% (+5.55)#86 18.7% (-1.54)#5,703
87. Sentinel 17.1% 11.6% (+5.51)#87 18.7% (-1.59)#5,717
88. Blackwell 17.0% 11.6% (+5.49)#88 18.7% (-1.61)#5,726
89. Anadarko 16.8% 11.6% (+5.22)#89 18.7% (-1.88)#5,794
90. Purcell 16.7% 11.6% (+5.17)#90 18.7% (-1.93)#5,806
91. Mangum 16.7% 11.6% (+5.17)#91 18.7% (-1.93)#5,807
92. Watts 16.3% 11.6% (+4.79)#92 18.7% (-2.31)#5,932
93. Burns Flat 16.3% 11.6% (+4.76)#93 18.7% (-2.34)#5,944
94. Lawton 16.0% 11.6% (+4.44)#94 18.7% (-2.65)#6,040
95. Poteau 15.9% 11.6% (+4.32)#95 18.7% (-2.78)#6,089
96. Mannsville 15.8% 11.6% (+4.29)#96 18.7% (-2.81)#6,097
97. Cache 15.8% 11.6% (+4.22)#97 18.7% (-2.88)#6,124
98. Erick 15.6% 11.6% (+4.09)#98 18.7% (-3.01)#6,160
99. Lexington 15.6% 11.6% (+4.06)#99 18.7% (-3.04)#6,167
100. Enid 15.6% 11.6% (+4.01)#100 18.7% (-3.09)#6,188

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma are:
#1
88.2%
#2
86.9%
#3
68.3%
#4
67.7%
#5
64.4%
#6
64.0%
#7
58.5%
#8
55.3%
#9
50.5%
#10
45.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma?
Optima has the Highest Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma with 88.2%.
What is the Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in Oklahoma is 11.6%.
What is the Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in the United States?
Percentage of Hispanic or Latino Population in the United States is 18.7%.