Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Educational Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Iron Post 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#1 9.3% (+90.7)#24
2. Hopeton 100.0% 9.2% (+90.8)#2 9.3% (+90.7)#38
3. Brush Creek 59.8% 9.2% (+50.6)#3 9.3% (+50.5)#119
4. Hillsdale 56.8% 9.2% (+47.5)#4 9.3% (+47.4)#140
5. Bowring 54.3% 9.2% (+45.1)#5 9.3% (+45.0)#167
6. Sand Point 51.1% 9.2% (+41.8)#6 9.3% (+41.8)#195
7. Oak Hill-Piney 50.0% 9.2% (+40.8)#7 9.3% (+40.7)#205
8. Bentley 47.4% 9.2% (+38.1)#8 9.3% (+38.1)#247
9. Colony 46.6% 9.2% (+37.4)#9 9.3% (+37.3)#259
10. Oakwood 42.9% 9.2% (+33.6)#10 9.3% (+33.5)#329
11. Dennis 41.8% 9.2% (+32.5)#11 9.3% (+32.5)#357
12. Bull Hollow 40.4% 9.2% (+31.2)#12 9.3% (+31.1)#383
13. Langston 38.0% 9.2% (+28.7)#13 9.3% (+28.7)#447
14. Titanic 36.7% 9.2% (+27.4)#14 9.3% (+27.4)#490
15. Reagan 36.4% 9.2% (+27.1)#15 9.3% (+27.0)#508
16. Goodwell 34.2% 9.2% (+24.9)#16 9.3% (+24.8)#610
17. Sams Corner 34.0% 9.2% (+24.8)#17 9.3% (+24.7)#614
18. Cloud Creek 33.3% 9.2% (+24.1)#18 9.3% (+24.0)#638
19. Sweetwater 33.3% 9.2% (+24.1)#19 9.3% (+24.0)#641
20. Dwight Mission 33.3% 9.2% (+24.1)#20 9.3% (+24.0)#646
21. Friendship 33.3% 9.2% (+24.1)#22 9.3% (+24.0)#650
22. Avard 33.3% 9.2% (+24.1)#23 9.3% (+24.0)#651
23. Stillwater 33.2% 9.2% (+24.0)#24 9.3% (+23.9)#657
24. Johnson Prairie 32.4% 9.2% (+23.2)#25 9.3% (+23.1)#692
25. Mcbride 32.1% 9.2% (+22.9)#26 9.3% (+22.8)#704
26. Cave Spring 31.0% 9.2% (+21.7)#27 9.3% (+21.6)#770
27. Bee 29.4% 9.2% (+20.2)#28 9.3% (+20.1)#859
28. Mulberry 29.2% 9.2% (+19.9)#29 9.3% (+19.9)#876
29. Cottonwood 28.9% 9.2% (+19.7)#30 9.3% (+19.6)#889
30. Forgan 28.8% 9.2% (+19.6)#31 9.3% (+19.5)#898
31. Panola 27.3% 9.2% (+18.0)#32 9.3% (+18.0)#1,034
32. Webb City 27.3% 9.2% (+18.0)#33 9.3% (+18.0)#1,039
33. Horntown 26.7% 9.2% (+17.4)#34 9.3% (+17.4)#1,082
34. Morrison 26.6% 9.2% (+17.4)#35 9.3% (+17.3)#1,085
35. Scipio 25.8% 9.2% (+16.6)#36 9.3% (+16.5)#1,170
36. Ingalls 25.6% 9.2% (+16.4)#37 9.3% (+16.3)#1,188
37. Armstrong 25.5% 9.2% (+16.3)#38 9.3% (+16.2)#1,198
38. Preston 25.4% 9.2% (+16.2)#39 9.3% (+16.1)#1,211
39. Emet 25.0% 9.2% (+15.8)#40 9.3% (+15.7)#1,250
40. Bunch 25.0% 9.2% (+15.8)#41 9.3% (+15.7)#1,253
41. Deer Creek 24.3% 9.2% (+15.1)#42 9.3% (+15.0)#1,326
42. Albany 24.0% 9.2% (+14.8)#43 9.3% (+14.7)#1,367
43. Crescent Springs 23.9% 9.2% (+14.7)#44 9.3% (+14.6)#1,379
44. Strong City 23.8% 9.2% (+14.6)#45 9.3% (+14.5)#1,397
45. Bug Tussle 23.6% 9.2% (+14.4)#46 9.3% (+14.3)#1,437
46. Freedom 23.4% 9.2% (+14.2)#47 9.3% (+14.1)#1,459
47. Grand Lake Towne 23.1% 9.2% (+13.8)#48 9.3% (+13.8)#1,514
48. Smithville 23.1% 9.2% (+13.8)#49 9.3% (+13.8)#1,519
49. Lima 23.1% 9.2% (+13.8)#50 9.3% (+13.8)#1,521
50. New Eucha 23.0% 9.2% (+13.8)#51 9.3% (+13.7)#1,527
51. Faxon 22.2% 9.2% (+13.0)#52 9.3% (+12.9)#1,652
52. Sequoyah 21.9% 9.2% (+12.6)#53 9.3% (+12.6)#1,709
53. Akins 21.8% 9.2% (+12.6)#54 9.3% (+12.5)#1,718
54. Briartown 21.7% 9.2% (+12.5)#55 9.3% (+12.4)#1,735
55. Reydon 21.6% 9.2% (+12.4)#56 9.3% (+12.3)#1,753
56. Bryant 21.4% 9.2% (+12.2)#57 9.3% (+12.1)#1,791
57. Lyons Switch 21.4% 9.2% (+12.2)#58 9.3% (+12.1)#1,793
58. Moffett 21.1% 9.2% (+11.8)#59 9.3% (+11.7)#1,873
59. Chewey 20.7% 9.2% (+11.5)#60 9.3% (+11.4)#1,960
60. Grandview 20.5% 9.2% (+11.3)#61 9.3% (+11.2)#2,002
61. Calumet 20.0% 9.2% (+10.8)#62 9.3% (+10.7)#2,104
62. Fort Gibson 19.7% 9.2% (+10.5)#63 9.3% (+10.4)#2,197
63. Cartwright 19.7% 9.2% (+10.5)#64 9.3% (+10.4)#2,210
64. Mountain View 19.4% 9.2% (+10.1)#65 9.3% (+10.1)#2,289
65. Loyal 19.4% 9.2% (+10.1)#66 9.3% (+10.0)#2,298
66. Hough 19.2% 9.2% (+10.00)#67 9.3% (+9.92)#2,332
67. Gans 19.0% 9.2% (+9.73)#68 9.3% (+9.65)#2,394
68. Eldon 18.8% 9.2% (+9.61)#69 9.3% (+9.53)#2,434
69. Blair 18.8% 9.2% (+9.59)#70 9.3% (+9.50)#2,448
70. Leedey 18.6% 9.2% (+9.38)#71 9.3% (+9.30)#2,519
71. Long 18.6% 9.2% (+9.36)#72 9.3% (+9.27)#2,533
72. Nardin 18.5% 9.2% (+9.23)#73 9.3% (+9.15)#2,577
73. Chance 18.4% 9.2% (+9.17)#74 9.3% (+9.08)#2,601
74. Devol 18.3% 9.2% (+9.08)#75 9.3% (+8.99)#2,642
75. Tahlequah 18.3% 9.2% (+9.04)#76 9.3% (+8.96)#2,654
76. Cedar Valley 18.2% 9.2% (+9.00)#77 9.3% (+8.92)#2,671
77. Fanshawe 17.8% 9.2% (+8.59)#78 9.3% (+8.51)#2,813
78. Barber 17.4% 9.2% (+8.19)#79 9.3% (+8.10)#2,975
79. Ballou 16.9% 9.2% (+7.62)#80 9.3% (+7.54)#3,244
80. Warner 16.8% 9.2% (+7.54)#81 9.3% (+7.46)#3,277
81. Hartshorne 16.7% 9.2% (+7.43)#82 9.3% (+7.35)#3,315
82. Rattan 16.7% 9.2% (+7.43)#83 9.3% (+7.35)#3,333
83. Norman 16.6% 9.2% (+7.39)#84 9.3% (+7.31)#3,391
84. Longtown 16.6% 9.2% (+7.38)#85 9.3% (+7.30)#3,399
85. Muldrow 16.5% 9.2% (+7.29)#86 9.3% (+7.21)#3,447
86. Weatherford 16.5% 9.2% (+7.26)#87 9.3% (+7.17)#3,459
87. Cashion 16.3% 9.2% (+7.05)#88 9.3% (+6.97)#3,543
88. Welch 16.3% 9.2% (+7.05)#89 9.3% (+6.96)#3,546
89. Leach 16.3% 9.2% (+7.05)#90 9.3% (+6.96)#3,550
90. Crowder 16.2% 9.2% (+6.96)#91 9.3% (+6.88)#3,607
91. Fort Coffee 16.2% 9.2% (+6.94)#92 9.3% (+6.86)#3,617
92. Gore 16.2% 9.2% (+6.93)#93 9.3% (+6.85)#3,622
93. Lebanon 16.2% 9.2% (+6.93)#94 9.3% (+6.85)#3,625
94. Temple 16.2% 9.2% (+6.92)#95 9.3% (+6.84)#3,627
95. Rocky Mountain 15.9% 9.2% (+6.71)#96 9.3% (+6.63)#3,752
96. Alva 15.8% 9.2% (+6.57)#97 9.3% (+6.49)#3,821
97. Elgin 15.7% 9.2% (+6.47)#98 9.3% (+6.39)#3,880
98. Cherokee 15.6% 9.2% (+6.40)#99 9.3% (+6.31)#3,918
99. Jones 15.5% 9.2% (+6.22)#100 9.3% (+6.14)#4,031
100. Whippoorwill 15.4% 9.2% (+6.15)#101 9.3% (+6.07)#4,088

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
59.8%
#3
56.8%
#4
46.6%
#5
42.9%
#6
41.8%
#7
40.4%
#8
38.0%
#9
36.7%
#10
34.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma?
Iron Post has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in Oklahoma is 9.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Educational Services in the United States is 9.3%.