Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oak Hill-Piney 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#26
2. New Woodville 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#2 11.3% (+88.7)#85
3. Jefferson 100.0% 13.9% (+86.1)#3 11.3% (+88.7)#106
4. Mulberry 97.5% 13.9% (+83.6)#4 11.3% (+86.2)#121
5. Rosston 89.5% 13.9% (+75.5)#5 11.3% (+78.1)#146
6. Bee 85.5% 13.9% (+71.6)#6 11.3% (+74.2)#169
7. Butler 83.6% 13.9% (+69.6)#7 11.3% (+72.2)#176
8. Knowles 75.0% 13.9% (+61.1)#8 11.3% (+63.7)#248
9. New Alluwe 70.0% 13.9% (+56.1)#9 11.3% (+58.7)#317
10. Tyrone 60.3% 13.9% (+46.4)#10 11.3% (+49.0)#489
11. Boley 60.0% 13.9% (+46.1)#11 11.3% (+48.7)#496
12. Chewey 59.6% 13.9% (+45.7)#12 11.3% (+48.3)#515
13. Byars 59.1% 13.9% (+45.1)#13 11.3% (+47.7)#540
14. Platter 56.8% 13.9% (+42.8)#14 11.3% (+45.4)#600
15. Elohim 56.2% 13.9% (+42.3)#15 11.3% (+44.9)#616
16. Smithville 54.2% 13.9% (+40.2)#16 11.3% (+42.8)#693
17. White Water 54.2% 13.9% (+40.2)#17 11.3% (+42.8)#696
18. Bradley 54.0% 13.9% (+40.1)#18 11.3% (+42.7)#699
19. Old Green 53.1% 13.9% (+39.1)#19 11.3% (+41.7)#734
20. Moffett 52.8% 13.9% (+38.8)#20 11.3% (+41.4)#746
21. Baker 52.6% 13.9% (+38.7)#21 11.3% (+41.3)#750
22. Blue 51.2% 13.9% (+37.2)#22 11.3% (+39.8)#809
23. Yeager 50.8% 13.9% (+36.9)#23 11.3% (+39.5)#829
24. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 50.3% 13.9% (+36.3)#24 11.3% (+38.9)#853
25. Nelagoney 47.4% 13.9% (+33.4)#25 11.3% (+36.0)#1,020
26. Bennington 47.0% 13.9% (+33.1)#26 11.3% (+35.6)#1,034
27. Bowring 46.4% 13.9% (+32.5)#27 11.3% (+35.1)#1,075
28. Little Rock 46.2% 13.9% (+32.3)#28 11.3% (+34.9)#1,089
29. Monroe 45.8% 13.9% (+31.9)#29 11.3% (+34.5)#1,116
30. Yale 44.3% 13.9% (+30.4)#30 11.3% (+32.9)#1,207
31. Cloud Creek 43.2% 13.9% (+29.3)#31 11.3% (+31.9)#1,275
32. Deer Lick 43.1% 13.9% (+29.2)#32 11.3% (+31.8)#1,285
33. Langston 42.5% 13.9% (+28.5)#33 11.3% (+31.1)#1,340
34. Nicut 42.4% 13.9% (+28.5)#34 11.3% (+31.0)#1,349
35. Boswell 42.3% 13.9% (+28.4)#35 11.3% (+31.0)#1,357
36. Martha 42.2% 13.9% (+28.3)#36 11.3% (+30.8)#1,364
37. Tenkiller 42.0% 13.9% (+28.1)#37 11.3% (+30.7)#1,376
38. Mccurtain 41.9% 13.9% (+27.9)#38 11.3% (+30.5)#1,384
39. Shamrock 41.7% 13.9% (+27.7)#39 11.3% (+30.3)#1,408
40. Douglas 41.7% 13.9% (+27.7)#40 11.3% (+30.3)#1,409
41. Lima 41.2% 13.9% (+27.2)#41 11.3% (+29.8)#1,456
42. Dustin 41.1% 13.9% (+27.1)#42 11.3% (+29.7)#1,467
43. Fitzhugh 40.9% 13.9% (+27.0)#43 11.3% (+29.6)#1,488
44. Hodgen 40.9% 13.9% (+27.0)#44 11.3% (+29.6)#1,493
45. Atwood 40.8% 13.9% (+26.9)#45 11.3% (+29.5)#1,499
46. Sportmans Shores 40.4% 13.9% (+26.4)#46 11.3% (+29.0)#1,544
47. Hoyt 40.0% 13.9% (+26.1)#47 11.3% (+28.7)#1,572
48. Keota 39.9% 13.9% (+26.0)#48 11.3% (+28.6)#1,586
49. White Eagle 39.7% 13.9% (+25.8)#49 11.3% (+28.4)#1,597
50. Hanna 38.9% 13.9% (+25.0)#50 11.3% (+27.5)#1,687
51. Short 38.1% 13.9% (+24.2)#51 11.3% (+26.8)#1,769
52. Devol 37.6% 13.9% (+23.7)#52 11.3% (+26.3)#1,827
53. Loco 37.5% 13.9% (+23.6)#53 11.3% (+26.2)#1,844
54. Emet 37.5% 13.9% (+23.6)#54 11.3% (+26.2)#1,847
55. Twin Oaks 37.4% 13.9% (+23.5)#55 11.3% (+26.1)#1,858
56. Pumpkin Hollow 37.2% 13.9% (+23.3)#56 11.3% (+25.9)#1,882
57. Bell 37.1% 13.9% (+23.1)#57 11.3% (+25.7)#1,894
58. Whippoorwill 37.0% 13.9% (+23.1)#58 11.3% (+25.7)#1,901
59. Coalgate 36.0% 13.9% (+22.1)#59 11.3% (+24.7)#2,019
60. Temple 36.0% 13.9% (+22.1)#60 11.3% (+24.7)#2,020
61. Okemah 35.5% 13.9% (+21.6)#61 11.3% (+24.1)#2,081
62. Bache 35.4% 13.9% (+21.5)#62 11.3% (+24.1)#2,095
63. Wapanucka 35.4% 13.9% (+21.5)#63 11.3% (+24.1)#2,098
64. Weleetka 35.0% 13.9% (+21.1)#64 11.3% (+23.7)#2,148
65. Heavener 34.9% 13.9% (+21.0)#65 11.3% (+23.5)#2,164
66. Lake Ellsworth Addition 34.6% 13.9% (+20.7)#66 11.3% (+23.3)#2,203
67. Council Hill 34.0% 13.9% (+20.1)#67 11.3% (+22.7)#2,282
68. Cowlington 34.0% 13.9% (+20.1)#68 11.3% (+22.7)#2,288
69. Park Hill 34.0% 13.9% (+20.0)#69 11.3% (+22.6)#2,291
70. Okeene 33.9% 13.9% (+19.9)#70 11.3% (+22.5)#2,302
71. Salina 33.6% 13.9% (+19.6)#71 11.3% (+22.2)#2,346
72. Briggs 33.3% 13.9% (+19.4)#72 11.3% (+22.0)#2,370
73. Cooperton 33.3% 13.9% (+19.4)#73 11.3% (+22.0)#2,408
74. Gene Autry 33.0% 13.9% (+19.1)#74 11.3% (+21.7)#2,442
75. Commerce 33.0% 13.9% (+19.1)#75 11.3% (+21.7)#2,443
76. Hobart 33.0% 13.9% (+19.1)#76 11.3% (+21.7)#2,444
77. Tishomingo 33.0% 13.9% (+19.0)#77 11.3% (+21.6)#2,453
78. Erick 32.9% 13.9% (+19.0)#78 11.3% (+21.6)#2,460
79. Sallisaw 32.8% 13.9% (+18.9)#79 11.3% (+21.5)#2,478
80. Keys 32.7% 13.9% (+18.7)#80 11.3% (+21.3)#2,496
81. Blanco 32.5% 13.9% (+18.6)#81 11.3% (+21.2)#2,516
82. Mcbride 32.4% 13.9% (+18.4)#82 11.3% (+21.0)#2,541
83. Lawrence Creek 32.1% 13.9% (+18.2)#83 11.3% (+20.8)#2,579
84. Lebanon 32.1% 13.9% (+18.2)#84 11.3% (+20.8)#2,584
85. Skedee 32.0% 13.9% (+18.1)#85 11.3% (+20.7)#2,604
86. Waurika 31.7% 13.9% (+17.7)#86 11.3% (+20.3)#2,669
87. Flute Springs 31.7% 13.9% (+17.7)#87 11.3% (+20.3)#2,671
88. Watts 31.4% 13.9% (+17.5)#88 11.3% (+20.1)#2,708
89. Amorita 31.2% 13.9% (+17.3)#89 11.3% (+19.9)#2,739
90. Stillwater 31.2% 13.9% (+17.3)#90 11.3% (+19.9)#2,742
91. Taloga 31.2% 13.9% (+17.3)#91 11.3% (+19.9)#2,749
92. Sayre 31.1% 13.9% (+17.2)#92 11.3% (+19.7)#2,768
93. Blackburn 31.0% 13.9% (+17.0)#93 11.3% (+19.6)#2,800
94. Belfonte 30.9% 13.9% (+17.0)#94 11.3% (+19.6)#2,811
95. Cameron 30.9% 13.9% (+16.9)#95 11.3% (+19.5)#2,817
96. Hammon 30.8% 13.9% (+16.9)#96 11.3% (+19.5)#2,820
97. River Bottom 30.7% 13.9% (+16.8)#97 11.3% (+19.4)#2,842
98. Gracemont 30.5% 13.9% (+16.6)#98 11.3% (+19.2)#2,869
99. Waynoka 30.5% 13.9% (+16.6)#99 11.3% (+19.1)#2,871
100. Centrahoma 30.4% 13.9% (+16.5)#100 11.3% (+19.1)#2,887

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
97.5%
#4
89.5%
#5
85.5%
#6
83.6%
#7
75.0%
#8
70.0%
#9
60.3%
#10
60.0%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma?
New Woodville has the Highest Male Poverty Level in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Males in Oklahoma is 13.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.