Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Transportation
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Texola 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#19
2. Durham 70.0% 3.7% (+66.3)#2 3.8% (+66.2)#39
3. Sugden 56.2% 3.7% (+52.5)#3 3.8% (+52.4)#60
4. Fallis 48.4% 3.7% (+44.7)#4 3.8% (+44.6)#111
5. Bull Hollow 40.4% 3.7% (+36.7)#5 3.8% (+36.6)#167
6. Olive 36.4% 3.7% (+32.6)#6 3.8% (+32.5)#218
7. Amorita 30.8% 3.7% (+27.0)#7 3.8% (+27.0)#319
8. Tuskahoma 28.6% 3.7% (+24.8)#8 3.8% (+24.8)#371
9. Loco 27.3% 3.7% (+23.5)#9 3.8% (+23.5)#412
10. Short 26.3% 3.7% (+22.6)#10 3.8% (+22.5)#441
11. Dripping Springs 26.1% 3.7% (+22.4)#11 3.8% (+22.3)#456
12. Keyes 25.7% 3.7% (+22.0)#12 3.8% (+21.9)#465
13. Albany 24.0% 3.7% (+20.3)#13 3.8% (+20.2)#528
14. Hennepin 23.2% 3.7% (+19.4)#14 3.8% (+19.4)#574
15. Lawrence Creek 23.1% 3.7% (+19.3)#15 3.8% (+19.3)#577
16. Lakeside 21.4% 3.7% (+17.7)#16 3.8% (+17.6)#677
17. Watova 19.2% 3.7% (+15.5)#17 3.8% (+15.4)#860
18. Oak Grove 18.9% 3.7% (+15.2)#18 3.8% (+15.1)#886
19. Canadian Shores 18.8% 3.7% (+15.1)#19 3.8% (+15.0)#892
20. Sawyer 18.6% 3.7% (+14.8)#20 3.8% (+14.8)#919
21. Monroe 18.2% 3.7% (+14.4)#21 3.8% (+14.4)#977
22. Pin Oak Acres 18.0% 3.7% (+14.2)#22 3.8% (+14.1)#1,007
23. Whitesboro 17.9% 3.7% (+14.2)#23 3.8% (+14.1)#1,010
24. Mead 17.0% 3.7% (+13.2)#24 3.8% (+13.1)#1,125
25. Sparrowhawk 16.9% 3.7% (+13.2)#25 3.8% (+13.1)#1,127
26. Dotyville 16.9% 3.7% (+13.2)#26 3.8% (+13.1)#1,133
27. Long 16.7% 3.7% (+12.9)#27 3.8% (+12.8)#1,159
28. Rosedale 16.7% 3.7% (+12.9)#28 3.8% (+12.8)#1,182
29. Bradley 16.1% 3.7% (+12.4)#29 3.8% (+12.3)#1,247
30. Rocky 15.9% 3.7% (+12.2)#30 3.8% (+12.1)#1,272
31. Carlton Landing 15.8% 3.7% (+12.1)#31 3.8% (+12.0)#1,290
32. Castle 15.4% 3.7% (+11.7)#32 3.8% (+11.6)#1,353
33. Taft 15.4% 3.7% (+11.7)#33 3.8% (+11.6)#1,357
34. Ketchum 15.2% 3.7% (+11.5)#34 3.8% (+11.4)#1,383
35. Pensacola 15.2% 3.7% (+11.5)#35 3.8% (+11.4)#1,386
36. Arpelar 15.2% 3.7% (+11.4)#36 3.8% (+11.4)#1,392
37. Reydon 14.9% 3.7% (+11.1)#37 3.8% (+11.0)#1,458
38. Macomb 14.3% 3.7% (+10.6)#38 3.8% (+10.5)#1,587
39. Dill City 14.2% 3.7% (+10.5)#39 3.8% (+10.4)#1,599
40. Bromide 14.0% 3.7% (+10.2)#40 3.8% (+10.1)#1,651
41. Rocky Point 13.7% 3.7% (+10.0)#41 3.8% (+9.92)#1,693
42. River Bottom 13.6% 3.7% (+9.90)#42 3.8% (+9.82)#1,721
43. Golden 13.6% 3.7% (+9.90)#43 3.8% (+9.82)#1,726
44. Covington 13.5% 3.7% (+9.77)#44 3.8% (+9.68)#1,748
45. Hooker 13.5% 3.7% (+9.74)#45 3.8% (+9.65)#1,757
46. Willow 13.4% 3.7% (+9.66)#46 3.8% (+9.58)#1,788
47. Rose 13.3% 3.7% (+9.60)#47 3.8% (+9.52)#1,802
48. Blackburn 12.9% 3.7% (+9.17)#48 3.8% (+9.09)#1,925
49. Lane 12.7% 3.7% (+8.99)#49 3.8% (+8.91)#1,979
50. Leonard 12.7% 3.7% (+8.96)#50 3.8% (+8.88)#1,992
51. Sharon 12.6% 3.7% (+8.91)#51 3.8% (+8.83)#2,006
52. Whitefield 12.6% 3.7% (+8.84)#52 3.8% (+8.75)#2,025
53. Hodgen 12.5% 3.7% (+8.77)#53 3.8% (+8.68)#2,057
54. Carmen 12.4% 3.7% (+8.67)#54 3.8% (+8.59)#2,085
55. Keefton 12.3% 3.7% (+8.59)#55 3.8% (+8.51)#2,108
56. Longtown 12.3% 3.7% (+8.56)#56 3.8% (+8.48)#2,121
57. Milfay 12.2% 3.7% (+8.51)#57 3.8% (+8.43)#2,143
58. Dover 12.2% 3.7% (+8.48)#58 3.8% (+8.40)#2,153
59. Seiling 12.2% 3.7% (+8.47)#59 3.8% (+8.39)#2,156
60. Johnson 12.1% 3.7% (+8.34)#60 3.8% (+8.26)#2,200
61. Pickett 12.0% 3.7% (+8.25)#61 3.8% (+8.17)#2,239
62. Meno 11.9% 3.7% (+8.15)#62 3.8% (+8.07)#2,274
63. Anadarko 11.9% 3.7% (+8.15)#63 3.8% (+8.07)#2,276
64. Alex 11.7% 3.7% (+8.01)#64 3.8% (+7.92)#2,339
65. New Cordell 11.7% 3.7% (+7.97)#65 3.8% (+7.88)#2,349
66. Hickory 11.7% 3.7% (+7.93)#66 3.8% (+7.85)#2,361
67. Foss 11.6% 3.7% (+7.89)#67 3.8% (+7.81)#2,374
68. Gerty 11.5% 3.7% (+7.80)#68 3.8% (+7.72)#2,419
69. Oakwood 11.4% 3.7% (+7.69)#69 3.8% (+7.61)#2,467
70. South Coffeyville 11.4% 3.7% (+7.66)#70 3.8% (+7.58)#2,478
71. Maysville 11.3% 3.7% (+7.58)#71 3.8% (+7.50)#2,509
72. Lehigh 11.2% 3.7% (+7.50)#72 3.8% (+7.42)#2,541
73. Calvin 11.2% 3.7% (+7.47)#73 3.8% (+7.38)#2,557
74. Mountain Park 11.2% 3.7% (+7.47)#74 3.8% (+7.38)#2,558
75. Canadian 11.1% 3.7% (+7.38)#75 3.8% (+7.29)#2,586
76. Terlton 11.1% 3.7% (+7.38)#76 3.8% (+7.29)#2,601
77. Steely Hollow 11.0% 3.7% (+7.24)#77 3.8% (+7.16)#2,651
78. Waynoka 10.9% 3.7% (+7.14)#78 3.8% (+7.06)#2,692
79. Crescent Springs 10.9% 3.7% (+7.14)#79 3.8% (+7.05)#2,698
80. Indianola 10.8% 3.7% (+7.08)#80 3.8% (+6.99)#2,721
81. Gage 10.5% 3.7% (+6.79)#81 3.8% (+6.71)#2,828
82. Bessie 10.5% 3.7% (+6.79)#82 3.8% (+6.71)#2,832
83. Pauls Valley 10.4% 3.7% (+6.63)#83 3.8% (+6.55)#2,922
84. Fargo 10.3% 3.7% (+6.59)#84 3.8% (+6.51)#2,953
85. Fairview 10.3% 3.7% (+6.57)#85 3.8% (+6.49)#2,960
86. Arnett 10.3% 3.7% (+6.57)#86 3.8% (+6.48)#2,961
87. Brushy 10.3% 3.7% (+6.56)#87 3.8% (+6.47)#2,969
88. Stuart 10.3% 3.7% (+6.52)#88 3.8% (+6.44)#2,986
89. Wainwright 10.3% 3.7% (+6.52)#89 3.8% (+6.44)#2,988
90. Dacoma 10.2% 3.7% (+6.47)#90 3.8% (+6.39)#3,017
91. Mooreland 10.1% 3.7% (+6.38)#91 3.8% (+6.29)#3,056
92. Fairmont 10.0% 3.7% (+6.27)#92 3.8% (+6.18)#3,119
93. Council Hill 10.0% 3.7% (+6.27)#93 3.8% (+6.18)#3,130
94. Devol 9.9% 3.7% (+6.13)#94 3.8% (+6.04)#3,215
95. Rush Springs 9.8% 3.7% (+6.09)#95 3.8% (+6.01)#3,227
96. Davis 9.8% 3.7% (+6.02)#96 3.8% (+5.94)#3,266
97. Tatums 9.8% 3.7% (+6.02)#97 3.8% (+5.94)#3,271
98. Cherokee 9.7% 3.7% (+5.96)#98 3.8% (+5.88)#3,317
99. Remy 9.7% 3.7% (+5.96)#99 3.8% (+5.87)#3,322
100. Coyle 9.7% 3.7% (+5.94)#100 3.8% (+5.86)#3,327

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
56.2%
#3
48.4%
#4
40.4%
#5
30.8%
#6
28.6%
#7
27.3%
#8
26.3%
#9
26.1%
#10
25.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma?
Texola has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in Oklahoma is 3.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States is 3.8%.