Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Retail Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Argo 100.0% 11.6% (+88.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#57
2. Carbon 64.3% 11.6% (+52.7)#2 11.0% (+53.3)#122
3. Rinard 60.9% 11.6% (+49.3)#3 11.0% (+49.9)#145
4. Irvington 60.6% 11.6% (+49.0)#4 11.0% (+49.6)#151
5. Toronto 51.9% 11.6% (+40.3)#5 11.0% (+40.9)#226
6. Thayer 50.0% 11.6% (+38.4)#6 11.0% (+39.0)#247
7. Elkport 50.0% 11.6% (+38.4)#7 11.0% (+39.0)#252
8. Hepburn 50.0% 11.6% (+38.4)#8 11.0% (+39.0)#254
9. Douds 48.5% 11.6% (+36.9)#9 11.0% (+37.5)#272
10. Popejoy 48.1% 11.6% (+36.6)#10 11.0% (+37.2)#278
11. Portland 46.7% 11.6% (+35.1)#11 11.0% (+35.7)#305
12. Hardy 42.9% 11.6% (+31.3)#12 11.0% (+31.9)#396
13. Clio 42.1% 11.6% (+30.5)#13 11.0% (+31.1)#418
14. Delphos 40.0% 11.6% (+28.4)#14 11.0% (+29.0)#483
15. Kinross 38.7% 11.6% (+27.1)#15 11.0% (+27.7)#526
16. Lucas 38.6% 11.6% (+27.0)#16 11.0% (+27.6)#528
17. St Anthony 38.6% 11.6% (+27.0)#17 11.0% (+27.6)#529
18. Percival 38.5% 11.6% (+26.9)#18 11.0% (+27.5)#538
19. Coppock 37.5% 11.6% (+25.9)#19 11.0% (+26.5)#584
20. Cotter 37.5% 11.6% (+25.9)#20 11.0% (+26.5)#585
21. St Benedict 37.0% 11.6% (+25.4)#21 11.0% (+26.0)#602
22. Trenton 36.7% 11.6% (+25.1)#22 11.0% (+25.7)#616
23. Sharpsburg 36.4% 11.6% (+24.8)#23 11.0% (+25.4)#628
24. Lone Rock 36.2% 11.6% (+24.6)#24 11.0% (+25.2)#636
25. Russell 36.0% 11.6% (+24.4)#25 11.0% (+25.0)#640
26. Lockridge 35.3% 11.6% (+23.7)#26 11.0% (+24.3)#665
27. Dana 35.3% 11.6% (+23.7)#27 11.0% (+24.3)#671
28. Livermore 35.2% 11.6% (+23.6)#28 11.0% (+24.2)#680
29. Pacific Junction 35.1% 11.6% (+23.5)#29 11.0% (+24.1)#686
30. North Washington 35.1% 11.6% (+23.5)#30 11.0% (+24.1)#687
31. Loveland 34.6% 11.6% (+23.0)#31 11.0% (+23.6)#714
32. New Albin 34.1% 11.6% (+22.5)#32 11.0% (+23.1)#745
33. Wever 33.3% 11.6% (+21.7)#33 11.0% (+22.3)#782
34. Ayrshire 33.3% 11.6% (+21.7)#34 11.0% (+22.3)#784
35. Dows 32.5% 11.6% (+20.9)#35 11.0% (+21.5)#870
36. Harper 32.1% 11.6% (+20.6)#36 11.0% (+21.2)#897
37. Climbing Hill 32.0% 11.6% (+20.4)#37 11.0% (+21.0)#905
38. Marysville 32.0% 11.6% (+20.4)#38 11.0% (+21.0)#906
39. Sandusky 31.5% 11.6% (+20.0)#39 11.0% (+20.5)#940
40. Chariton 30.1% 11.6% (+18.5)#40 11.0% (+19.1)#1,053
41. Prairieburg 29.9% 11.6% (+18.3)#41 11.0% (+18.9)#1,072
42. Bronson 29.7% 11.6% (+18.1)#42 11.0% (+18.7)#1,095
43. Williamson 29.6% 11.6% (+18.0)#43 11.0% (+18.6)#1,098
44. Derby 29.5% 11.6% (+18.0)#44 11.0% (+18.6)#1,112
45. Wiota 29.4% 11.6% (+17.8)#45 11.0% (+18.4)#1,123
46. Danbury 29.2% 11.6% (+17.6)#46 11.0% (+18.2)#1,143
47. Larrabee 28.9% 11.6% (+17.3)#47 11.0% (+17.9)#1,170
48. Bradford 28.6% 11.6% (+17.0)#48 11.0% (+17.6)#1,206
49. Weldon 28.6% 11.6% (+17.0)#49 11.0% (+17.6)#1,213
50. Gibson 27.8% 11.6% (+16.2)#50 11.0% (+16.8)#1,317
51. Lincoln 27.3% 11.6% (+15.7)#51 11.0% (+16.3)#1,375
52. Essex 27.2% 11.6% (+15.6)#52 11.0% (+16.2)#1,383
53. Stanley 27.0% 11.6% (+15.4)#53 11.0% (+16.0)#1,415
54. Deloit 26.9% 11.6% (+15.3)#54 11.0% (+15.9)#1,431
55. Ferguson 26.3% 11.6% (+14.7)#55 11.0% (+15.3)#1,512
56. Dougherty 26.3% 11.6% (+14.7)#56 11.0% (+15.3)#1,513
57. California Junction 26.1% 11.6% (+14.5)#57 11.0% (+15.1)#1,539
58. Grant 26.1% 11.6% (+14.5)#58 11.0% (+15.1)#1,540
59. Graf 26.1% 11.6% (+14.5)#59 11.0% (+15.1)#1,541
60. Rock Falls 26.0% 11.6% (+14.4)#60 11.0% (+15.0)#1,547
61. Hazleton 25.8% 11.6% (+14.2)#61 11.0% (+14.8)#1,589
62. Keomah Village 25.6% 11.6% (+14.1)#62 11.0% (+14.7)#1,605
63. Dexter 25.5% 11.6% (+13.9)#63 11.0% (+14.5)#1,638
64. Lovilia 25.3% 11.6% (+13.7)#64 11.0% (+14.3)#1,685
65. Batavia 25.1% 11.6% (+13.5)#65 11.0% (+14.1)#1,715
66. Duncan 25.0% 11.6% (+13.4)#66 11.0% (+14.0)#1,751
67. Sandyville 25.0% 11.6% (+13.4)#67 11.0% (+14.0)#1,757
68. Owasa 25.0% 11.6% (+13.4)#68 11.0% (+14.0)#1,767
69. Union 24.8% 11.6% (+13.2)#69 11.0% (+13.8)#1,799
70. Shelby 24.5% 11.6% (+12.9)#70 11.0% (+13.5)#1,859
71. Okoboji 24.4% 11.6% (+12.8)#71 11.0% (+13.4)#1,874
72. Everly 24.3% 11.6% (+12.7)#72 11.0% (+13.3)#1,894
73. Clemons 24.0% 11.6% (+12.4)#73 11.0% (+13.0)#1,966
74. Cherokee 23.7% 11.6% (+12.2)#74 11.0% (+12.8)#2,029
75. Conroy 23.7% 11.6% (+12.1)#75 11.0% (+12.7)#2,043
76. Patterson 23.6% 11.6% (+12.0)#76 11.0% (+12.6)#2,052
77. Edgewood 23.5% 11.6% (+12.0)#77 11.0% (+12.6)#2,067
78. Numa 23.5% 11.6% (+11.9)#78 11.0% (+12.5)#2,083
79. Rutland 23.4% 11.6% (+11.8)#79 11.0% (+12.4)#2,127
80. Olin 23.4% 11.6% (+11.8)#80 11.0% (+12.4)#2,133
81. Floris 23.4% 11.6% (+11.8)#81 11.0% (+12.4)#2,135
82. Eddyville 23.3% 11.6% (+11.8)#82 11.0% (+12.4)#2,138
83. Gruver 23.1% 11.6% (+11.5)#83 11.0% (+12.1)#2,200
84. Moulton 23.0% 11.6% (+11.4)#84 11.0% (+12.0)#2,226
85. Walnut 22.9% 11.6% (+11.3)#85 11.0% (+11.9)#2,252
86. Houghton 22.9% 11.6% (+11.3)#86 11.0% (+11.9)#2,261
87. Arthur 22.8% 11.6% (+11.2)#87 11.0% (+11.8)#2,275
88. Thompson 22.6% 11.6% (+11.0)#88 11.0% (+11.6)#2,322
89. Swan 22.6% 11.6% (+11.0)#89 11.0% (+11.6)#2,334
90. Ainsworth 22.4% 11.6% (+10.8)#90 11.0% (+11.4)#2,395
91. Charter Oak 22.2% 11.6% (+10.6)#91 11.0% (+11.2)#2,428
92. Greenville 22.2% 11.6% (+10.6)#92 11.0% (+11.2)#2,438
93. Crystal Lake 22.1% 11.6% (+10.5)#93 11.0% (+11.1)#2,483
94. Van Wert 22.0% 11.6% (+10.4)#94 11.0% (+11.0)#2,492
95. Hanlontown 21.8% 11.6% (+10.3)#95 11.0% (+10.9)#2,551
96. Albion 21.8% 11.6% (+10.2)#96 11.0% (+10.8)#2,560
97. Corydon 21.8% 11.6% (+10.2)#97 11.0% (+10.8)#2,570
98. Knierim 21.7% 11.6% (+10.2)#98 11.0% (+10.7)#2,583
99. Sioux Rapids 21.7% 11.6% (+10.1)#99 11.0% (+10.7)#2,595
100. Cushing 21.6% 11.6% (+10.1)#100 11.0% (+10.7)#2,609

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa are:
#1
64.3%
#2
60.9%
#3
60.6%
#4
51.9%
#5
50.0%
#6
50.0%
#7
50.0%
#8
48.5%
#9
48.1%
#10
46.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa?
Carbon has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa with 64.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Iowa is 11.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States is 11.0%.