Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Retail Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Albee 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#62
2. Camp Crook 85.0% 11.4% (+73.6)#2 11.0% (+74.0)#65
3. Verdon 75.0% 11.4% (+63.6)#3 11.0% (+64.0)#81
4. Norris 52.9% 11.4% (+41.6)#4 11.0% (+42.0)#215
5. Butler 50.0% 11.4% (+38.6)#5 11.0% (+39.0)#257
6. Northville 45.6% 11.4% (+34.2)#6 11.0% (+34.6)#329
7. Tolstoy 41.4% 11.4% (+30.0)#7 11.0% (+30.4)#438
8. La Plant 40.9% 11.4% (+29.5)#8 11.0% (+29.9)#450
9. Claire City 37.3% 11.4% (+25.9)#9 11.0% (+26.3)#592
10. Buffalo Gap 35.3% 11.4% (+23.9)#10 11.0% (+24.3)#667
11. Belvidere 35.3% 11.4% (+23.9)#11 11.0% (+24.3)#668
12. Burbank 34.4% 11.4% (+23.0)#12 11.0% (+23.4)#725
13. Interior 33.3% 11.4% (+22.0)#13 11.0% (+22.3)#797
14. Rockham 33.3% 11.4% (+22.0)#14 11.0% (+22.3)#806
15. Pukwana 32.4% 11.4% (+21.0)#15 11.0% (+21.4)#877
16. Blucksberg Mountain 32.3% 11.4% (+20.9)#16 11.0% (+21.3)#888
17. Rowena 32.1% 11.4% (+20.8)#17 11.0% (+21.2)#899
18. Midland 31.0% 11.4% (+19.6)#18 11.0% (+20.0)#980
19. Dolton 30.0% 11.4% (+18.6)#19 11.0% (+19.0)#1,065
20. Brant Lake South 29.7% 11.4% (+18.4)#20 11.0% (+18.8)#1,083
21. Fruitdale 29.3% 11.4% (+17.9)#21 11.0% (+18.3)#1,136
22. Mansfield 29.3% 11.4% (+17.9)#22 11.0% (+18.3)#1,138
23. Little Eagle 29.2% 11.4% (+17.8)#23 11.0% (+18.2)#1,145
24. Kadoka 28.1% 11.4% (+16.7)#24 11.0% (+17.1)#1,272
25. Oahe Acres 27.9% 11.4% (+16.5)#25 11.0% (+16.9)#1,298
26. Roslyn 27.8% 11.4% (+16.4)#26 11.0% (+16.8)#1,314
27. Sicangu 26.5% 11.4% (+15.1)#27 11.0% (+15.5)#1,483
28. Wessington Springs 26.0% 11.4% (+14.6)#28 11.0% (+15.0)#1,556
29. Cresbard 25.6% 11.4% (+14.2)#29 11.0% (+14.6)#1,622
30. Claremont 25.5% 11.4% (+14.1)#30 11.0% (+14.5)#1,637
31. Philip 25.3% 11.4% (+13.9)#31 11.0% (+14.3)#1,670
32. Colome 25.1% 11.4% (+13.8)#32 11.0% (+14.2)#1,701
33. Wonderland Homes 25.1% 11.4% (+13.7)#33 11.0% (+14.1)#1,718
34. Vilas 25.0% 11.4% (+13.6)#34 11.0% (+14.0)#1,768
35. Draper 25.0% 11.4% (+13.6)#35 11.0% (+14.0)#1,770
36. Buffalo 24.5% 11.4% (+13.1)#36 11.0% (+13.5)#1,856
37. Green Valley 24.4% 11.4% (+13.0)#37 11.0% (+13.4)#1,873
38. Edgemont 23.9% 11.4% (+12.5)#38 11.0% (+12.9)#1,984
39. Herreid 23.8% 11.4% (+12.5)#39 11.0% (+12.9)#1,993
40. South Shore 23.7% 11.4% (+12.3)#40 11.0% (+12.7)#2,039
41. Lebanon 23.4% 11.4% (+12.0)#41 11.0% (+12.4)#2,119
42. Central City 23.3% 11.4% (+12.0)#42 11.0% (+12.3)#2,145
43. Delmont 22.7% 11.4% (+11.3)#43 11.0% (+11.7)#2,288
44. Fairfax 22.7% 11.4% (+11.3)#44 11.0% (+11.7)#2,290
45. Newell 22.3% 11.4% (+11.0)#45 11.0% (+11.4)#2,399
46. Armour 22.3% 11.4% (+11.0)#46 11.0% (+11.3)#2,403
47. Anderson 21.9% 11.4% (+10.5)#47 11.0% (+10.9)#2,522
48. Langford 21.7% 11.4% (+10.3)#48 11.0% (+10.7)#2,591
49. Seneca 21.4% 11.4% (+10.1)#49 11.0% (+10.4)#2,686
50. Altamont 21.4% 11.4% (+10.1)#50 11.0% (+10.4)#2,687
51. Allen 21.4% 11.4% (+9.99)#51 11.0% (+10.4)#2,702
52. Shindler 21.0% 11.4% (+9.60)#52 11.0% (+9.98)#2,855
53. Bristol 20.7% 11.4% (+9.36)#53 11.0% (+9.75)#2,936
54. Kranzburg 20.2% 11.4% (+8.78)#54 11.0% (+9.17)#3,180
55. Hill City 20.1% 11.4% (+8.73)#55 11.0% (+9.12)#3,199
56. Menno 19.6% 11.4% (+8.18)#56 11.0% (+8.57)#3,477
57. Mission 19.3% 11.4% (+7.94)#57 11.0% (+8.33)#3,589
58. Summerset 18.9% 11.4% (+7.56)#58 11.0% (+7.95)#3,804
59. Gettysburg 18.9% 11.4% (+7.54)#59 11.0% (+7.93)#3,810
60. Wilmot 18.8% 11.4% (+7.41)#60 11.0% (+7.80)#3,886
61. Lake Norden 18.7% 11.4% (+7.30)#61 11.0% (+7.69)#3,950
62. St Lawrence 18.4% 11.4% (+7.04)#62 11.0% (+7.43)#4,108
63. Lake Poinsett 18.2% 11.4% (+6.80)#63 11.0% (+7.19)#4,245
64. Ashland Heights 18.0% 11.4% (+6.67)#64 11.0% (+7.06)#4,344
65. Peever 18.0% 11.4% (+6.62)#65 11.0% (+7.01)#4,382
66. Conde 18.0% 11.4% (+6.62)#66 11.0% (+7.01)#4,383
67. Faulkton 17.6% 11.4% (+6.27)#67 11.0% (+6.66)#4,614
68. Ortley 17.6% 11.4% (+6.27)#68 11.0% (+6.66)#4,632
69. Rosebud 17.5% 11.4% (+6.14)#69 11.0% (+6.53)#4,731
70. Gayville 17.5% 11.4% (+6.13)#70 11.0% (+6.52)#4,735
71. Lemmon 17.5% 11.4% (+6.12)#71 11.0% (+6.51)#4,740
72. Big Stone City 17.5% 11.4% (+6.10)#72 11.0% (+6.49)#4,767
73. Wagner 17.5% 11.4% (+6.09)#73 11.0% (+6.48)#4,785
74. Two Strike 17.3% 11.4% (+5.93)#74 11.0% (+6.32)#4,899
75. Onida 17.1% 11.4% (+5.75)#75 11.0% (+6.14)#5,046
76. Wall 17.1% 11.4% (+5.68)#76 11.0% (+6.07)#5,102
77. Lesterville 16.9% 11.4% (+5.51)#77 11.0% (+5.89)#5,232
78. Bonesteel 16.9% 11.4% (+5.48)#78 11.0% (+5.86)#5,247
79. Ashton 16.9% 11.4% (+5.48)#79 11.0% (+5.86)#5,249
80. North Sioux City 16.8% 11.4% (+5.46)#80 11.0% (+5.85)#5,257
81. Enemy Swim 16.3% 11.4% (+4.95)#81 11.0% (+5.34)#5,730
82. Pickstown 16.3% 11.4% (+4.92)#82 11.0% (+5.31)#5,767
83. Grenville 16.3% 11.4% (+4.90)#83 11.0% (+5.29)#5,790
84. Tabor 16.3% 11.4% (+4.89)#84 11.0% (+5.28)#5,800
85. Groton 16.2% 11.4% (+4.82)#85 11.0% (+5.21)#5,862
86. Quinn 16.1% 11.4% (+4.75)#86 11.0% (+5.14)#5,925
87. Winner 16.1% 11.4% (+4.74)#87 11.0% (+5.12)#5,937
88. Summit 16.0% 11.4% (+4.67)#88 11.0% (+5.06)#5,981
89. Johnson Siding 15.9% 11.4% (+4.56)#89 11.0% (+4.95)#6,092
90. Volin 15.8% 11.4% (+4.46)#90 11.0% (+4.85)#6,190
91. Twin Brooks 15.8% 11.4% (+4.41)#91 11.0% (+4.80)#6,242
92. Beresford 15.8% 11.4% (+4.39)#92 11.0% (+4.78)#6,257
93. Warner 15.7% 11.4% (+4.35)#93 11.0% (+4.74)#6,299
94. Henry 15.6% 11.4% (+4.25)#94 11.0% (+4.64)#6,413
95. Bryant 15.5% 11.4% (+4.13)#95 11.0% (+4.51)#6,539
96. Nisland 15.5% 11.4% (+4.10)#96 11.0% (+4.49)#6,570
97. Artesian 15.4% 11.4% (+4.01)#97 11.0% (+4.40)#6,680
98. Keystone 15.3% 11.4% (+3.97)#98 11.0% (+4.36)#6,726
99. Springfield 15.2% 11.4% (+3.82)#99 11.0% (+4.20)#6,903
100. Chancellor 15.2% 11.4% (+3.79)#100 11.0% (+4.18)#6,934

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
85.0%
#3
75.0%
#4
52.9%
#5
50.0%
#6
45.6%
#7
41.4%
#8
40.9%
#9
37.3%
#10
35.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota?
Albee has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in South Dakota is 11.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States is 11.0%.