Cherokee vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,732,315 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 14.7 Chileans.
Cherokee Integration in Chilean Communities

Cherokee vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $46,459, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,605, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $106,611, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $56,973, a difference of 17.1%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Income
Income MetricCherokeeChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Fair
26.3%

Cherokee vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.3%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.6%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeChilean
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Cherokee vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeChilean
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Cherokee vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Cherokee vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeChilean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Good
30.7%

Cherokee vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeChilean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
6.4%

Cherokee vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 49.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cherokee vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.6%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.2%).
Cherokee vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeChilean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%