Cherokee vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,184,729 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $78,960, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $74,847, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $67,715, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $33,437, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $39,648, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 11.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.47%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.83%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.6%).