Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Bahamas

Fair
Tragic
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,263,232 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Immigrants from Bahamas.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.2%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $45,176, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $76,910, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,203 compared to $37,193, a difference of 0.030%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $35,027, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,174, a difference of 1.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$37,193
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$84,732
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$71,349
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$39,861
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$45,176
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$35,027
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$45,793
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$76,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$83,177
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$53,174
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and poverty (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
41.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
40.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
52.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.5%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.24%), ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
42.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Bahamas
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%