Cherokee vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,985,364 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,266, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $76,784, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,209 compared to $88,267, a difference of 0.070%), median earnings ($41,252 compared to $41,737, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $38,065, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%), currently married (46.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 76.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.2%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.4%).