Cherokee vs Scottish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Scottish

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scottish Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,980,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Scottish.
Cherokee Integration in Scottish Communities

Cherokee vs Scottish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $44,440, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $102,123, a difference of 18.6%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $104,288, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,554, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,397, a difference of 10.5%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Income
Income MetricCherokeeScottish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Good
$44,440
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Good
$104,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Average
$85,101
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Average
$46,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Good
$55,793
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$38,397
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,554
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Average
$94,622
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Good
$102,123
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Good
$61,735
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.1%

Cherokee vs Scottish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.1%), receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.1%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeScottish
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Cherokee vs Scottish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeScottish
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Cherokee vs Scottish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeScottish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Cherokee vs Scottish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeScottish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Average
31.7%

Cherokee vs Scottish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeScottish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
61.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Cherokee vs Scottish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeScottish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
67.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Excellent
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Cherokee vs Scottish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Cherokee vs Scottish Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeScottish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%