Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Guatemala
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 346,259,638 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 7.3 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,447, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $46,244, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.34%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $86,573, a difference of 0.52%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $81,341, a difference of 0.62%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Tragic $37,550 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Tragic $87,191 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Tragic $75,123 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Tragic $40,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Tragic $46,244 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Tragic $35,444 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Poor $51,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Tragic $81,341 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Tragic $86,573 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Tragic $53,950 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 24.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.1% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.14%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.5% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.7%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.9%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 91.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 90.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 89.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 87.4% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 85.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 84.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 77.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 38.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.9%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |