Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Guatemala

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 346,259,638 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 7.3 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,447, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $46,244, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.34%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $86,573, a difference of 0.52%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $81,341, a difference of 0.62%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$37,550
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$87,191
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$75,123
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$40,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$46,244
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$35,444
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Poor
$51,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$81,341
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$86,573
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$53,950
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.1%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.14%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
42.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
37.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.7%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.9%), associate's degree (38.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
90.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
89.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
87.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
85.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
84.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
77.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
56.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
38.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.9%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Guatemala
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%