Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Fair
Poor
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,334,815 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Cherokee Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 41.9%), median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $40,958, a difference of 17.9%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $41,655, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $55,327, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $51,446, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $91,357, a difference of 6.1%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
Income MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$41,655
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$94,466
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$80,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Fair
$45,820
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$51,446
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$40,958
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Good
$52,631
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$89,856
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$91,357
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$55,327
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
19.3%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), poverty (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.0%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
22.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
30.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
71.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.9%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
36.5%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 207.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 82.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 68.8%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
23.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
76.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
40.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
13.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
4.3%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.98%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
35.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.8%).
Cherokee vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Average
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%