Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Brazil

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,729,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Brazil.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $48,164, a difference of 29.5%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $90,907, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $100,534, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,487, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $62,364, a difference of 15.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$48,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$109,418
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$90,907
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$58,324
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,273
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,487
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$100,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$106,470
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Excellent
$62,364
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 23.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.7%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Brazil
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%