Cherokee vs Austrian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Austrian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Austrians

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,605
SOCIAL INDEX
83.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
60th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Austrian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,949,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Austrians.
Cherokee Integration in Austrian Communities

Cherokee vs Austrian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $48,116, a difference of 29.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $108,692, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $111,306, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,898, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $40,923, a difference of 17.8%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Income
Income MetricCherokeeAustrian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$48,116
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$111,306
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$91,339
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$49,501
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$59,359
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$40,923
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Fair
$51,898
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$101,842
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$108,692
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$64,470
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.4%

Cherokee vs Austrian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.8%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeAustrian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%

Cherokee vs Austrian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeAustrian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Cherokee vs Austrian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeAustrian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.0%

Cherokee vs Austrian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeAustrian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Good
31.0%

Cherokee vs Austrian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.3%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeAustrian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%

Cherokee vs Austrian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 47.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeAustrian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
67.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
49.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
40.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Cherokee vs Austrian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 38.6%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Cherokee vs Austrian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeAustrian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Excellent
2.4%