Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,583,781 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $47,394, a difference of 27.4%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $108,830, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $89,496, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,914, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $63,643, a difference of 17.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Good
25.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.88%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
6.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.4%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%