Cherokee vs Maltese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Maltese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Maltese

Fair
Excellent
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,141
SOCIAL INDEX
88.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
30th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Maltese Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,281,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Maltese.
Cherokee Integration in Maltese Communities

Cherokee vs Maltese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $110,064, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $97,015, a difference of 33.5%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,640, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,735, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $66,027, a difference of 22.0%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Income
Income MetricCherokeeMaltese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$49,640
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$115,862
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$97,015
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$52,526
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$62,953
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$43,357
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$53,735
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$110,064
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$114,754
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$66,027
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.7%

Cherokee vs Maltese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeMaltese
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
8.9%

Cherokee vs Maltese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeMaltese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cherokee vs Maltese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeMaltese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Cherokee vs Maltese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.87%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeMaltese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.8%

Cherokee vs Maltese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.1%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeMaltese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
6.7%

Cherokee vs Maltese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 52.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 51.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeMaltese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
69.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
50.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
41.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Cherokee vs Maltese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.7%), and male disability (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.0%).
Cherokee vs Maltese Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeMaltese
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%