Cherokee vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,490,156 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $58,353, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $124,429, a difference of 53.9%), and median family income ($88,209 compared to $134,818, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $56,835, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $72,963, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 67.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 43.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 67.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 153.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 135.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 73.4%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.2%).