Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Laos

Fair
Fair
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,745,198 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Immigrants from Laos.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 15.1%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $78,327, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $36,841, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $49,190, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $37,857, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($41,252 compared to $42,884, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 30.4%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.8%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.5%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
34.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 81.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.1%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%