Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Immigrants from Malaysia

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,913,182 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,983, a difference of 34.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $107,650, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $96,292, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $54,179, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $65,497, a difference of 21.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Fair
26.3%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 38.6%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 34.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.4%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.7%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 73.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 58.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.6%).
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%